From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757356Ab3K1UTF (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:19:05 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:57017 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753855Ab3K1UTC (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:19:02 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Dirk Brandewie , Lists linaro-kernel , Patch Tracking , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nishanth Menon , Carlos Hernandez Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: Make sure CPU is running on a freq from freq-table Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 21:31:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1591147.c0NqbMglPZ@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.12.0-rc6+; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <046513da96dfec919a1a41d270c167147d4a9c8d.1385353358.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <2065797.S0ijuuXCoe@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, November 28, 2013 07:44:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 28 November 2013 19:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, November 28, 2013 07:11:17 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> Okay.. So wouldn't it be better that we add this special flag only when we > >> face a real problem? Otherwise this flag might stay unused for long time > >> and then we might end up removing it.. > > What about this one? Well, so are you saying that the problem is only theoretical now? > > SKIP_INITIAL_FREQUENCY_CHECK ? > > Looks fine.. In case this is required, you want this to be set initially for any > driver? That depends on what is less work and code churn. How many platforms/drivers have this problem today? Which ones are they? Rafael