From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
maz@kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] arm64: perf: Remove PMU locking
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:17:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <159242503203.62212.1690942414916053920@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617113851.607706-4-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Quoting Alexandru Elisei (2020-06-17 04:38:47)
> From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
>
> The PMU is disabled and enabled, and the counters are programmed from
> contexts where interrupts or preemption is disabled.
>
> The functions to toggle the PMU and to program the PMU counters access the
> registers directly and don't access data modified by the interrupt handler.
> That, and the fact that they're always called from non-preemptible
> contexts, means that we don't need to disable interrupts or use a spinlock.
Maybe we should add a lockdep assertion that the code isn't preemptible?
I.e. add a cant_sleep() call? Or is it more that we don't need locking
because we're just doing register accesses and don't need to protect
those accesses from each other?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-17 11:38 [PATCH v5 0/7] arm_pmu: Use NMI for perf interrupt Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] arm64: perf: Add missing ISB in armv8pmu_enable_event() Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 20:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-18 10:50 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: perf: Avoid PMXEV* indirection Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 20:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-18 10:51 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-19 8:26 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] arm64: perf: Remove PMU locking Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 20:17 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2020-06-18 10:51 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-19 8:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-07-03 13:45 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] arm64: perf: Defer irq_work to IPI_IRQ_WORK Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-22 14:19 ` Mark Rutland
2020-06-23 9:47 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] arm64: kvm: pmu: Make overflow handler NMI safe Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] arm_pmu: Introduce pmu_irq_ops Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 20:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-18 10:51 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-19 8:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] arm_pmu: arm64: Use NMIs for PMU Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] arm_pmu: Use NMI for perf interrupt Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=159242503203.62212.1690942414916053920@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).