From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF837C433DF for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF9020849 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:45:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593045943; bh=FEAhPTzXwf9/a1MkZxoTkGk5AsCEybOOMPbaOkXOhFQ=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:List-ID:From; b=wpu7bF3eFLrzhC1dryL2F1bjrwFpVpDTBxhGgquGvRjvZN4Hng3FxDy8+YHv1j6zl hUA8fmCN4w214hILH/JIra6AHwDA8+mNqR/3d7u+lWcE+4wc64ctzVyq9TDGnk3cUK 6TvnLJCoBYXsp+NRZuR1+lJMaa4K1ViZyzBihcBE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389531AbgFYApl (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 20:45:41 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59550 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388776AbgFYApj (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 20:45:39 -0400 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 390E5207DD; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:45:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593045939; bh=FEAhPTzXwf9/a1MkZxoTkGk5AsCEybOOMPbaOkXOhFQ=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=tFBSOAt8C6PWkW6FUaiEb8HokkMM8f4+6KCCBObo59di2n7Z8ijB3kA5tYv+OTS/B oQQyrP8DlIBAMjDpmCmE95Ki9D4PCc8glNTvBXAXYI/aewbRqyJfu4fkdCOFooZHNR NZ8qcNxbDeML98mGHqaqVtlkO9HsNlWsDc5rD0Vk= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <4738f77ee7de9b48a3bb1c558ead958d0cc064d9.1592210452.git-series.maxime@cerno.tech> References: <4738f77ee7de9b48a3bb1c558ead958d0cc064d9.1592210452.git-series.maxime@cerno.tech> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 20/27] clk: bcm: rpi: Add an enum for the firmware clocks From: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Stevenson , Tim Gover , Phil Elwell , Mike Turquette , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Zabel , Maxime Ripard To: Maxime Ripard , Nicolas Saenz Julienne Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:45:38 -0700 Message-ID: <159304593855.62212.13370559607640884860@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Maxime Ripard (2020-06-15 01:41:00) > While the firmware allows us to discover the available clocks, we need to > discriminate those clocks to only register the ones meaningful to Linux. > The firmware also doesn't provide a clock name, so having a list of the ID > will help us to give clocks a proper name later on. >=20 > Acked-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > --- Applied to clk-next