From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
yu-cheng.yu@intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, gorcunov@gmail.com,
hpa@zytor.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, like.xu@linux.intel.com,
yao.jin@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 11/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Unify the stored format of LBR information
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:20:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593195620-116988-12-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1593195620-116988-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Current LBR information in the structure x86_perf_task_context is stored
in a different format from the PEBS LBR record and Architecture LBR,
which prevents the sharing of the common codes.
Use the format of the PEBS LBR record as a unified format. Use a generic
name lbr_entry to replace pebs_lbr_entry.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 12 ++++++------
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 4 +---
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index dc43cc1..0d33f85 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static void adaptive_pebs_record_size_update(void)
if (pebs_data_cfg & PEBS_DATACFG_XMMS)
sz += sizeof(struct pebs_xmm);
if (pebs_data_cfg & PEBS_DATACFG_LBRS)
- sz += x86_pmu.lbr_nr * sizeof(struct pebs_lbr_entry);
+ sz += x86_pmu.lbr_nr * sizeof(struct lbr_entry);
cpuc->pebs_record_size = sz;
}
@@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ static void setup_pebs_adaptive_sample_data(struct perf_event *event,
struct pebs_lbr *lbr = next_record;
int num_lbr = ((format_size >> PEBS_DATACFG_LBR_SHIFT)
& 0xff) + 1;
- next_record = next_record + num_lbr*sizeof(struct pebs_lbr_entry);
+ next_record = next_record + num_lbr * sizeof(struct lbr_entry);
if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
intel_pmu_store_pebs_lbrs(lbr);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 918f89d..3d5fec4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -371,11 +371,11 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
for (i = 0; i < task_ctx->valid_lbrs; i++) {
lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask;
- wrlbr_from(lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr_from[i]);
- wrlbr_to (lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr_to[i]);
+ wrlbr_from(lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].from);
+ wrlbr_to(lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].to);
if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
- wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr_info[i]);
+ wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].info);
}
for (; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
@@ -435,10 +435,10 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
from = rdlbr_from(lbr_idx);
if (!from)
break;
- task_ctx->lbr_from[i] = from;
- task_ctx->lbr_to[i] = rdlbr_to(lbr_idx);
+ task_ctx->lbr[i].from = from;
+ task_ctx->lbr[i].to = rdlbr_to(lbr_idx);
if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
- rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr_info[i]);
+ rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].info);
}
task_ctx->valid_lbrs = i;
task_ctx->tos = tos;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 62fba45..fd16ed3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -755,12 +755,10 @@ struct x86_perf_task_context_opt {
};
struct x86_perf_task_context {
- u64 lbr_from[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
- u64 lbr_to[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
- u64 lbr_info[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
int tos;
int valid_lbrs;
struct x86_perf_task_context_opt opt;
+ struct lbr_entry lbr[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
};
#define x86_add_quirk(func_) \
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index d33cc82..7266aef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -262,12 +262,12 @@ struct pebs_xmm {
u64 xmm[16*2]; /* two entries for each register */
};
-struct pebs_lbr_entry {
+struct lbr_entry {
u64 from, to, info;
};
struct pebs_lbr {
- struct pebs_lbr_entry lbr[0]; /* Variable length */
+ struct lbr_entry lbr[0]; /* Variable length */
};
/*
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-26 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-26 18:19 [PATCH V2 00/23] Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH V2 01/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add Architectural LBRs feature bit kan.liang
2020-06-29 18:35 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH V2 02/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR reset kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 03/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR read kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 04/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add the function pointers for LBR save and restore kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 05/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out a new struct for generic optimization kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 06/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 07/23] x86/msr-index: Add bunch of MSRs for Arch LBR kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 08/23] perf/x86: Expose CPUID enumeration bits for arch LBR kan.liang
2020-06-30 15:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 15:36 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-30 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 09/23] perf/x86/intel: Check Arch LBR MSRs kan.liang
2020-06-30 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 15:29 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 10/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support LBR_CTL kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` kan.liang [this message]
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 12/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out rdlbr_all() and wrlbr_all() kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 13/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out intel_pmu_store_lbr kan.liang
2020-06-30 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 14/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-06-30 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 16:17 ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-30 16:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 15/23] perf/core: Factor out functions to allocate/free the task_ctx_data kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 16/23] perf/core: Use kmem_cache to allocate the PMU specific data kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 17/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Create kmem_cache for the LBR context data kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 18/23] perf/x86: Remove task_ctx_size kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 19/23] x86/fpu: Use proper mask to replace full instruction mask kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 20/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic supervisor feature for LBR kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 21/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Add helpers for LBR dynamic supervisor feature kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 22/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES/XRSTORS for LBR context switch kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 23/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES for arch LBR read kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1593195620-116988-12-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).