linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	yu-cheng.yu@intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, gorcunov@gmail.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
	eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, like.xu@linux.intel.com,
	yao.jin@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 04/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add the function pointers for LBR save and restore
Date: Fri,  3 Jul 2020 05:49:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593780569-62993-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1593780569-62993-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

The MSRs of Architectural LBR are different from previous model-specific
LBR. Perf has to implement different functions to save and restore them.

The function pointers for LBR save and restore are introduced. Perf
should initialize the corresponding functions at boot time.

The generic optimizations, e.g. avoiding restore LBR if no one else
touched them, still apply for Architectural LBRs. The related codes are
not moved to model-specific functions.

Current model-specific LBR functions are set as default.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c |  4 +++
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c  | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |  6 ++++
 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 6414b47..50cb3c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3981,6 +3981,8 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu core_pmu = {
 
 	.lbr_reset		= intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64,
 	.lbr_read		= intel_pmu_lbr_read_64,
+	.lbr_save		= intel_pmu_lbr_save,
+	.lbr_restore		= intel_pmu_lbr_restore,
 };
 
 static __initconst const struct x86_pmu intel_pmu = {
@@ -4029,6 +4031,8 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu intel_pmu = {
 
 	.lbr_reset		= intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64,
 	.lbr_read		= intel_pmu_lbr_read_64,
+	.lbr_save		= intel_pmu_lbr_save,
+	.lbr_restore		= intel_pmu_lbr_restore,
 };
 
 static __init void intel_clovertown_quirk(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index b8943f4..b2b8dc9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -323,31 +323,13 @@ static inline u64 rdlbr_to(unsigned int idx)
 	return val;
 }
 
-static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx = ctx;
 	int i;
 	unsigned lbr_idx, mask;
-	u64 tos;
-
-	if (task_ctx->lbr_callstack_users == 0 ||
-	    task_ctx->lbr_stack_state == LBR_NONE) {
-		intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
-		return;
-	}
-
-	tos = task_ctx->tos;
-	/*
-	 * Does not restore the LBR registers, if
-	 * - No one else touched them, and
-	 * - Did not enter C6
-	 */
-	if ((task_ctx == cpuc->last_task_ctx) &&
-	    (task_ctx->log_id == cpuc->last_log_id) &&
-	    rdlbr_from(tos)) {
-		task_ctx->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
-		return;
-	}
+	u64 tos = task_ctx->tos;
 
 	mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
 	for (i = 0; i < task_ctx->valid_lbrs; i++) {
@@ -368,24 +350,48 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
 	}
 
 	wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_tos, tos);
-	task_ctx->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
 
 	if (cpuc->lbr_select)
 		wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_SELECT, task_ctx->lbr_sel);
 }
 
-static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
-	unsigned lbr_idx, mask;
-	u64 tos, from;
-	int i;
+	u64 tos;
 
-	if (task_ctx->lbr_callstack_users == 0) {
+	if (task_ctx->lbr_callstack_users == 0 ||
+	    task_ctx->lbr_stack_state == LBR_NONE) {
+		intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
+		return;
+	}
+
+	tos = task_ctx->tos;
+	/*
+	 * Does not restore the LBR registers, if
+	 * - No one else touched them, and
+	 * - Did not enter C6
+	 */
+	if ((task_ctx == cpuc->last_task_ctx) &&
+	    (task_ctx->log_id == cpuc->last_log_id) &&
+	    rdlbr_from(tos)) {
 		task_ctx->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
 		return;
 	}
 
+	x86_pmu.lbr_restore(task_ctx);
+
+	task_ctx->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+}
+
+void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx = ctx;
+	unsigned lbr_idx, mask;
+	u64 tos, from;
+	int i;
+
 	mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
 	tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
 	for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
@@ -400,13 +406,26 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
 	}
 	task_ctx->valid_lbrs = i;
 	task_ctx->tos = tos;
+
+	if (cpuc->lbr_select)
+		rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_SELECT, task_ctx->lbr_sel);
+}
+
+static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+{
+	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+
+	if (task_ctx->lbr_callstack_users == 0) {
+		task_ctx->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	x86_pmu.lbr_save(task_ctx);
+
 	task_ctx->lbr_stack_state = LBR_VALID;
 
 	cpuc->last_task_ctx = task_ctx;
 	cpuc->last_log_id = ++task_ctx->log_id;
-
-	if (cpuc->lbr_select)
-		rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_SELECT, task_ctx->lbr_sel);
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_swap_task_ctx(struct perf_event_context *prev,
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 312d27f..6d11813 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -695,6 +695,8 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 
 	void		(*lbr_reset)(void);
 	void		(*lbr_read)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
+	void		(*lbr_save)(void *ctx);
+	void		(*lbr_restore)(void *ctx);
 
 	/*
 	 * Intel PT/LBR/BTS are exclusive
@@ -1090,6 +1092,10 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
 
+void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx);
+
+void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx);
+
 void intel_pmu_lbr_init_core(void);
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm(void);
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-03 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-03 12:49 [PATCH V3 00/23] Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 01/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add Architectural LBRs feature bit kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-09 23:00     ` Dave Hansen
2020-07-10  9:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 14:09       ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 02/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR reset kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 03/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR read kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` kan.liang [this message]
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add the function pointers for LBR save and restore tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 05/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out a new struct for generic optimization kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 06/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 07/23] x86/msr-index: Add bunch of MSRs for Arch LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 08/23] perf/x86: Expose CPUID enumeration bits for arch LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 09/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support LBR_CTL kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 10/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Unify the stored format of LBR information kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 11/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Mark the {rd,wr}lbr_{to,from} wrappers __always_inline kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 12/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out rdlbr_all() and wrlbr_all() kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 13/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out intel_pmu_store_lbr kan.liang
2020-07-03 19:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 20:59     ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-06 10:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-06 13:32         ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-06 14:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-06 22:29       ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-07  7:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 14/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 15/23] perf/core: Factor out functions to allocate/free the task_ctx_data kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 16/23] perf/core: Use kmem_cache to allocate the PMU specific data kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 17/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Create kmem_cache for the LBR context data kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 18/23] perf/x86: Remove task_ctx_size kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 19/23] x86/fpu: Use proper mask to replace full instruction mask kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 20/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic supervisor feature for LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-05-27 22:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 21/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Add helpers for LBR dynamic supervisor feature kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 22/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES/XRSTORS for LBR context switch kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 23/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES for arch LBR read kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 19:34 ` [PATCH V3 00/23] Support Architectural LBR Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1593780569-62993-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).