linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Kan Liang" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86 <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:51:52 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <159420191288.4006.3420651578991456355.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1593780569-62993-7-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     f42be8651a7a9d5cb165e5d176fc0b09621b4f4d
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/f42be8651a7a9d5cb165e5d176fc0b09621b4f4d
Author:        Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 03 Jul 2020 05:49:12 -07:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:38:52 +02:00

perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx

The type of task_ctx is hardcoded as struct x86_perf_task_context,
which doesn't apply for Architecture LBR. For example, Architecture LBR
doesn't have the TOS MSR. The number of LBR entries is variable. A new
struct will be introduced for Architecture LBR. Perf has to determine
the type of task_ctx at run time.

The type of task_ctx pointer is changed to 'void *', which will be
determined at run time.

The generic LBR optimization can be shared between Architecture LBR and
model-specific LBR. Both need to access the structure for the generic
LBR optimization. A helper task_context_opt() is introduced to retrieve
the pointer of the structure at run time.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1593780569-62993-7-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c  | 59 +++++++++++++++--------------------
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |  7 +++-
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index bba9939..e62baa9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -355,18 +355,17 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 		wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_SELECT, task_ctx->lbr_sel);
 }
 
-static __always_inline bool
-lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+static __always_inline bool lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(void *ctx)
 {
-	return !rdlbr_from(task_ctx->tos);
+	return !rdlbr_from(((struct x86_perf_task_context *)ctx)->tos);
 }
 
-static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 
-	if (task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users == 0 ||
-	    task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state == LBR_NONE) {
+	if (task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_callstack_users == 0 ||
+	    task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state == LBR_NONE) {
 		intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
 		return;
 	}
@@ -376,16 +375,16 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
 	 * - No one else touched them, and
 	 * - Was not cleared in Cstate
 	 */
-	if ((task_ctx == cpuc->last_task_ctx) &&
-	    (task_ctx->opt.log_id == cpuc->last_log_id) &&
-	    !lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(task_ctx)) {
-		task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+	if ((ctx == cpuc->last_task_ctx) &&
+	    (task_context_opt(ctx)->log_id == cpuc->last_log_id) &&
+	    !lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(ctx)) {
+		task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
 		return;
 	}
 
-	x86_pmu.lbr_restore(task_ctx);
+	x86_pmu.lbr_restore(ctx);
 
-	task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+	task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
@@ -415,27 +414,27 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
 		rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_SELECT, task_ctx->lbr_sel);
 }
 
-static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 
-	if (task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users == 0) {
-		task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+	if (task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_callstack_users == 0) {
+		task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
 		return;
 	}
 
-	x86_pmu.lbr_save(task_ctx);
+	x86_pmu.lbr_save(ctx);
 
-	task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_VALID;
+	task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_VALID;
 
-	cpuc->last_task_ctx = task_ctx;
-	cpuc->last_log_id = ++task_ctx->opt.log_id;
+	cpuc->last_task_ctx = ctx;
+	cpuc->last_log_id = ++task_context_opt(ctx)->log_id;
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_swap_task_ctx(struct perf_event_context *prev,
 				 struct perf_event_context *next)
 {
-	struct x86_perf_task_context *prev_ctx_data, *next_ctx_data;
+	void *prev_ctx_data, *next_ctx_data;
 
 	swap(prev->task_ctx_data, next->task_ctx_data);
 
@@ -451,14 +450,14 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_swap_task_ctx(struct perf_event_context *prev,
 	if (!prev_ctx_data || !next_ctx_data)
 		return;
 
-	swap(prev_ctx_data->opt.lbr_callstack_users,
-	     next_ctx_data->opt.lbr_callstack_users);
+	swap(task_context_opt(prev_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users,
+	     task_context_opt(next_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users);
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
-	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
+	void *task_ctx;
 
 	if (!cpuc->lbr_users)
 		return;
@@ -495,7 +494,6 @@ static inline bool branch_user_callstack(unsigned br_sel)
 void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
-	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
 
 	if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
 		return;
@@ -505,10 +503,8 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
 
 	cpuc->br_sel = event->hw.branch_reg.reg;
 
-	if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) && event->ctx->task_ctx_data) {
-		task_ctx = event->ctx->task_ctx_data;
-		task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users++;
-	}
+	if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) && event->ctx->task_ctx_data)
+		task_context_opt(event->ctx->task_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users++;
 
 	/*
 	 * Request pmu::sched_task() callback, which will fire inside the
@@ -539,16 +535,13 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
 void intel_pmu_lbr_del(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
-	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
 
 	if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
 		return;
 
 	if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) &&
-	    event->ctx->task_ctx_data) {
-		task_ctx = event->ctx->task_ctx_data;
-		task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users--;
-	}
+	    event->ctx->task_ctx_data)
+		task_context_opt(event->ctx->task_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users--;
 
 	if (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT)
 		cpuc->lbr_select = 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 96d73cd..7dbf148 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
 	struct perf_branch_entry	lbr_entries[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
 	struct er_account		*lbr_sel;
 	u64				br_sel;
-	struct x86_perf_task_context	*last_task_ctx;
+	void				*last_task_ctx;
 	int				last_log_id;
 	int				lbr_select;
 
@@ -800,6 +800,11 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_ht_attr event_attr_##v = {		\
 struct pmu *x86_get_pmu(void);
 extern struct x86_pmu x86_pmu __read_mostly;
 
+static __always_inline struct x86_perf_task_context_opt *task_context_opt(void *ctx)
+{
+	return &((struct x86_perf_task_context *)ctx)->opt;
+}
+
 static inline bool x86_pmu_has_lbr_callstack(void)
 {
 	return  x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map &&

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-08  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-03 12:49 [PATCH V3 00/23] Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 01/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add Architectural LBRs feature bit kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-09 23:00     ` Dave Hansen
2020-07-10  9:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 14:09       ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 02/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR reset kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 03/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR read kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 04/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add the function pointers for LBR save and restore kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 05/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out a new struct for generic optimization kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 06/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang [this message]
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 07/23] x86/msr-index: Add bunch of MSRs for Arch LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 08/23] perf/x86: Expose CPUID enumeration bits for arch LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 09/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support LBR_CTL kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 10/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Unify the stored format of LBR information kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 11/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Mark the {rd,wr}lbr_{to,from} wrappers __always_inline kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 12/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out rdlbr_all() and wrlbr_all() kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 13/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out intel_pmu_store_lbr kan.liang
2020-07-03 19:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 20:59     ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-06 10:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-06 13:32         ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-06 14:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-06 22:29       ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-07  7:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 14/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 15/23] perf/core: Factor out functions to allocate/free the task_ctx_data kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 16/23] perf/core: Use kmem_cache to allocate the PMU specific data kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 17/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Create kmem_cache for the LBR context data kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 18/23] perf/x86: Remove task_ctx_size kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 19/23] x86/fpu: Use proper mask to replace full instruction mask kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 20/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic supervisor feature for LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-05-27 22:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 21/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Add helpers for LBR dynamic supervisor feature kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 22/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES/XRSTORS for LBR context switch kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 23/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES for arch LBR read kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 19:34 ` [PATCH V3 00/23] Support Architectural LBR Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=159420191288.4006.3420651578991456355.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).