From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
andi.kleen@intel.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com,
dave.hansen@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/4] make vm_committed_as_batch aware of vm overcommit policy
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 22:01:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1594389708-60781-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> (raw)
When checking a performance change for will-it-scale scalability
mmap test [1], we found very high lock contention for spinlock of
percpu counter 'vm_committed_as':
94.14% 0.35% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
48.21% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave;percpu_counter_add_batch;__vm_enough_memory;mmap_region;do_mmap;
45.91% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave;percpu_counter_add_batch;__do_munmap;
Actually this heavy lock contention is not always necessary. The
'vm_committed_as' needs to be very precise when the strict
OVERCOMMIT_NEVER policy is set, which requires a rather small batch
number for the percpu counter.
So keep 'batch' number unchanged for strict OVERCOMMIT_NEVER policy,
and enlarge it for not-so-strict OVERCOMMIT_ALWAYS and OVERCOMMIT_GUESS
policies.
Benchmark with the same testcase in [1] shows 53% improvement on a
8C/16T desktop, and 2097%(20X) on a 4S/72C/144T server. And for that
case, whether it shows improvements depends on if the test mmap size
is bigger than the batch number computed.
We tested 10+ platforms in 0day (server, desktop and laptop). If we
lift it to 64X, 80%+ platforms show improvements, and for 16X lift,
1/3 of the platforms will show improvements.
And generally it should help the mmap/unmap usage,as Michal Hocko
mentioned:
"
I believe that there are non-synthetic worklaods which would benefit
from a larger batch. E.g. large in memory databases which do large
mmaps during startups from multiple threads.
"
Note: There are some style complain from checkpatch for patch 4,
as sysctl handler declaration follows the similar format of sibling
functions
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200305062138.GI5972@shao2-debian/
patch1: a cleanup for /proc/meminfo
patch2: a preparation patch which also improve the accuracy of
vm_memory_committed
patch3: add a percpu_counter sync func
patch4: main change
Please help to review, thanks!
- Feng
----------------------------------------------------------------
Changelog:
v6:
* fix the ltp vm-overcommit test case fail reported
by 0day test robot, by syncing the percpu-counter
when changing policy to OVERCOMMIT_NEVER
v5:
* rebase after 5.8-rc1
* remove the 3/4 patch in v4 which is merged in v5.7
* add code comments for vm_memory_committed()
v4:
* Remove the VM_WARN_ONCE check for vm_committed_as underflow,
thanks to Qian Cai for finding and testing the warning
v3:
* refine commit log and cleanup code, according to comments
from Michal Hocko and Matthew Wilcox
* change the lift from 16X and 64X after test
v2:
* add the sysctl handler to cover runtime overcommit policy
change, as suggested by Andres Morton
* address the accuracy concern of vm_memory_committed()
from Andi Kleen
*** BLURB HERE ***
Feng Tang (4):
proc/meminfo: avoid open coded reading of vm_committed_as
mm/util.c: make vm_memory_committed() more accurate
percpu_counter: add percpu_counter_sync()
mm: adjust vm_committed_as_batch according to vm overcommit policy
fs/proc/meminfo.c | 2 +-
include/linux/mm.h | 2 ++
include/linux/mman.h | 4 ++++
include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 4 ++++
kernel/sysctl.c | 2 +-
lib/percpu_counter.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++
mm/mm_init.c | 22 +++++++++++++------
mm/util.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
8 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-10 14:01 Feng Tang [this message]
2020-07-10 14:01 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] proc/meminfo: avoid open coded reading of vm_committed_as Feng Tang
2020-07-10 14:01 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] mm/util.c: make vm_memory_committed() more accurate Feng Tang
2020-07-10 14:01 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] percpu_counter: add percpu_counter_sync() Feng Tang
2020-07-10 14:01 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] mm: adjust vm_committed_as_batch according to vm overcommit policy Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1594389708-60781-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).