linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: qianjun.kernel@gmail.com
To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
	luto@kernel.org, urezki@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: laoar.shao@gmail.com, jun qian <qianjun.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3] Softirq:avoid large sched delay from the pending softirqs
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:54:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1595480041-10597-1-git-send-email-qianjun.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)

From: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@gmail.com>

When get the pending softirqs, it need to process all the pending
softirqs in the while loop. If the processing time of each pending
softirq is need more than 2 msec in this loop, or one of the softirq
will running a long time, according to the original code logic, it
will process all the pending softirqs without wakeuping ksoftirqd,
which will cause a relatively large scheduling delay on the
corresponding CPU, which we do not wish to see. The patch will check
the total time to process pending softirq, if the time exceeds 2 ms
we need to wakeup the ksofirqd to aviod large sched delay.

Signed-off-by: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/softirq.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index c4201b7f..8f47554 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -200,17 +200,15 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
 /*
  * We restart softirq processing for at most MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART times,
  * but break the loop if need_resched() is set or after 2 ms.
- * The MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME provides a nice upper bound in most cases, but in
- * certain cases, such as stop_machine(), jiffies may cease to
- * increment and so we need the MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART limit as
- * well to make sure we eventually return from this method.
+ * In the loop, if the processing time of the softirq has exceeded 2
+ * milliseconds, we also need to break the loop to wakeup the ksofirqd.
  *
  * These limits have been established via experimentation.
  * The two things to balance is latency against fairness -
  * we want to handle softirqs as soon as possible, but they
  * should not be able to lock up the box.
  */
-#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME  msecs_to_jiffies(2)
+#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME_NS 2000000
 #define MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART 10
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
@@ -248,7 +246,7 @@ static inline void lockdep_softirq_end(bool in_hardirq) { }
 
 asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void)
 {
-	unsigned long end = jiffies + MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME;
+	ktime_t end = ktime_get() + MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME_NS;
 	unsigned long old_flags = current->flags;
 	int max_restart = MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART;
 	struct softirq_action *h;
@@ -299,6 +297,13 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void)
 		}
 		h++;
 		pending >>= softirq_bit;
+
+		/*
+		 * the softirq's action has been running for too much time
+		 * so it may need to wakeup the ksoftirqd
+		 */
+		if (need_resched() && ktime_get() > end)
+			break;
 	}
 
 	if (__this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd) == current)
@@ -307,8 +312,8 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void)
 
 	pending = local_softirq_pending();
 	if (pending) {
-		if (time_before(jiffies, end) && !need_resched() &&
-		    --max_restart)
+		if (!need_resched() && --max_restart &&
+		    ktime_get() <= end)
 			goto restart;
 
 		wakeup_softirqd();
-- 
1.8.3.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-23  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-23  4:54 qianjun.kernel [this message]
2020-07-23 13:41 ` [PATCH V3] Softirq:avoid large sched delay from the pending softirqs Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23 14:11   ` jun qian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1595480041-10597-1-git-send-email-qianjun.kernel@gmail.com \
    --to=qianjun.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).