From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD62C433E0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C63664DD6 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231201AbhA1N67 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:58:59 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:36656 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231159AbhA1N6t (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:58:49 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10SDc5uR082575; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:58:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=KICBQdiPxosM6E6Wp9wouZx2T0oKHT2ZNQCMtMecWlc=; b=NK00eXfVCLfi33n+uiwv20Q6fj1+lExRhQnpvedZb+qzV/cwDEEYgF2nXOmIbp2zdqtB BB6lUnnO/2r6jnM7Mm2u3AscjcHcCI9Rl/xLMkN5k9j1p9EmysGbQLRrUwQJXBBxKSsS Q2CNIWboTCYPcq56JvXqbQxKFLz4uZLsH0uNdqHJLBp9Euek0N0rbNTmwX2vw7ZD0Af7 XwtUrDIS7CgvcCMlKdALp5RxyjkiEa2Pi4D9i3dkgZR0B2bgNNjeRNYTyt9KPTHtTG6h nJ9HPGMwsRlTrjS5SK5cOo3H+r5BMRGMbXFkNCVoQFSocL6gpNvn5NWNp5JshUuSgjTO rA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36bqtek91m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:58:06 -0500 Received: from m0098404.ppops.net (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 10SDfDGC102369; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:58:05 -0500 Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36bqtek8yp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:58:05 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10SDohKr026398; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:58:04 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.29]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36a8uhjwr4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:58:04 +0000 Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.111]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 10SDw4Qm44564752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:58:04 GMT Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A52AC059; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:58:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056B2AC05E; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:58:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sbct-3.pok.ibm.com (unknown [9.47.158.153]) by b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:58:03 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for x509 certs with NIST p256 and p192 keys To: David Howells Cc: Stefan Berger , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patrick@puiterwijk.org References: <20210128001412.822048-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <3451836.1611825591@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <3561487.1611842073@warthog.procyon.org.uk> From: Stefan Berger Message-ID: <159fe247-b8c9-c718-1c2d-76cfb637f6dc@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:58:03 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3561487.1611842073@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343,18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-28_08:2021-01-28,2021-01-28 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101280065 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/28/21 8:54 AM, David Howells wrote: > Stefan Berger wrote: > >>> This (sub)set is intended to go through the keyrings tree or is it all going >>> through the crypto tree now? >> >> Patch 1/3 should go through 'crypto', the other ones through 'keyrings'. > Do 2 & 3 depend on 1? Functionality-wise, yes, compilation-wise, no.    Stefan