From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37BCC4727C for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83ED120780 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="CEQ51Ann" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732612AbgJAO53 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:57:29 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:33422 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732594AbgJAO5Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:57:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601564244; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zJbpakuHgD3JsKt9EUNvBPMetVb9AD7Xn6YaH4IxeBc=; b=CEQ51AnnUA9nSh3iGp5GFDO7oSfMKl19XjxArXJJyqya95vpAuxL/MHTs3tCawutuRU7b5 ieKykhuQ+UF/9r+k9Yf15HLAN1C/xoH0PvJ3kZxPaK8S3l6dWFMnC1Wqwnxh7HiZ84YTaw x7T2iSEZGaXHzY8EKkjLVnOt3M3mvCE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-57-HdJOj6UANcq25QIcRmkLaA-1; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 10:57:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: HdJOj6UANcq25QIcRmkLaA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD581084C97; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-116-196.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.196]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB88C19C78; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Subject: [PATCH net-next 05/23] rxrpc: Fix some missing _bh annotations on locking conn->state_lock From: David Howells To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:57:17 +0100 Message-ID: <160156423795.1728886.3034574197517613504.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <160156420377.1728886.5309670328610130816.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <160156420377.1728886.5309670328610130816.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> User-Agent: StGit/0.23 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org conn->state_lock may be taken in softirq mode, but a previous patch replaced an outer lock in the response-packet event handling code, and lost the _bh from that when doing so. Fix this by applying the _bh annotation to the state_lock locking. Fixes: a1399f8bb033 ("rxrpc: Call channels should have separate call number spaces") Signed-off-by: David Howells --- net/rxrpc/conn_event.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c index 0628dad2bdea..bba5d7906df6 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c @@ -342,18 +342,18 @@ static int rxrpc_process_event(struct rxrpc_connection *conn, return ret; spin_lock(&conn->bundle->channel_lock); - spin_lock(&conn->state_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&conn->state_lock); if (conn->state == RXRPC_CONN_SERVICE_CHALLENGING) { conn->state = RXRPC_CONN_SERVICE; - spin_unlock(&conn->state_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&conn->state_lock); for (loop = 0; loop < RXRPC_MAXCALLS; loop++) rxrpc_call_is_secure( rcu_dereference_protected( conn->channels[loop].call, lockdep_is_held(&conn->bundle->channel_lock))); } else { - spin_unlock(&conn->state_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&conn->state_lock); } spin_unlock(&conn->bundle->channel_lock);