linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
To: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: <cang@codeaurora.org>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Bao D. Nguyen" <nguyenb@codeaurora.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"Avri Altman" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: Keep UFS regulators on when autobkops enabled
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:14:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1603764857.2104.6.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6fd8e4d88eb331c9f04c74a3581593961f2caf73.1603747748.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>

Hi,

On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 14:31 -0700, Asutosh Das wrote:
> From: "Bao D. Nguyen" <nguyenb@codeaurora.org>
> 
> When bkops is enabled, the UFS device may do bkops during suspend.
> With bkops enabled during suspend, keep the regulators
> in active operation configuration, allowing the device to draw
> high power to support bkops and avoid over current event.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bao D. Nguyen <nguyenb@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 47c544d..a94543c 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -8523,7 +8523,9 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto set_dev_active;
>  
> -	ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(hba);
> +	/* Device may perform bkops if autobkops is enabled */
> +	if (!hba->auto_bkops_enabled)
> +		ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(hba);

If auto bkops is allowed and enabled during runtime suspend (currently
auto bkops is allow in runtime suspend only, and not allowed in system
suspend), hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable would be true and keep
the current device power mode, say Active Power Mode. In this case,
regulator would not be set as lpm mode by ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm().

Please correct me if I was wrong.

Thanks,
Stanley Chu



      reply	other threads:[~2020-10-27  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-26 21:31 [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: Keep UFS regulators on when autobkops enabled Asutosh Das
2020-10-27  2:14 ` Stanley Chu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1603764857.2104.6.camel@mtkswgap22 \
    --to=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=nguyenb@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).