From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261863AbTEFXyP (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 19:54:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261950AbTEFXyP (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 19:54:15 -0400 Received: from tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU ([129.94.242.28]:13255 "HELO tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261863AbTEFXyO (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 19:54:14 -0400 From: Neil Brown To: Wakko Warner Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 10:06:18 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16056.19962.192303.994466@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Cc: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , Ezra Nugroho , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: partitions in meta devices In-Reply-To: message from Wakko Warner on Monday May 5 References: <1052153060.29588.196.camel@ezran.goshen.edu> <3EB693B1.9020505@gmx.net> <1052153834.29676.219.camel@ezran.goshen.edu> <3EB69883.8090609@gmx.net> <20030505191604.GC10374@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030505173839.A22502@animx.eu.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.14 under Emacs 21.3.2 X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D > > OK. Maybe I wasn't clear enough. > > > 1. Partition a drive > > > 2. Reboot > > > 3. Now the kernel should see the partitions and let you create file > > > systems on them. > > > > > > You rebooted and fdisk sees the partitions now. Fine. Please try to > > > mke2fs /dev/md0p1 > > > That should work. If it doesn't, devfs could be the problem. > > > > No, it should not. And devfs, for once, has nothing to do with it. > > RAID devices (md*) have _one_ (1) minor allocated to each. Consequently, > > they could not be partitioned by any kernel - there is no device numbers > > to be assigned to their partitions. > > > > > Could you please tell us which kernel version you're using? > > > > What would be much more interesting, which kernel are _you_ using > > and what device numbers, in your experience, do these partitions get? > > I recall an MdPart patch for the kernel that would allow this, however, it > was way too buggy for real use. google for mdpart. Unreported bugs don't get fixed ... or did I miss your report? Work great for me on most of my servers. NeilBrown