From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c:ocores: do not handle IRQ if IF is not set
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:27:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1607303.K3FPNFt9tg@pcbe13614> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181029085259.GA4101@kunai>
On Monday, October 29, 2018 9:53:01 AM CET Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 04:12:10PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:14 PM Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
wrote:
> > > If the Interrupt Flag (IF) is not set, we should not handle the IRQ:
> > > - the line can be shared with other devices
> > > - it can be a spurious interrupt
> > >
> > > To avoid reading twice the status register, the ocores_process()
> > > function
> > > expects it to be read by the caller.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
> >
> > Looks good.
> >
> > Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
>
> I assume this patch will be resent when the other patches get updated?
> Or shall I pick this one independently of the others?
Since Peter did not answer yet, I would say to wait because I'm going to re-
send the full patch-set soon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-29 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 16:13 i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism Federico Vaga
2018-06-25 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] i2c:ocores: stop transfer on timeout Federico Vaga
2018-10-21 14:10 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-24 14:51 ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-26 17:46 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-25 7:42 ` Federico Vaga
2018-06-25 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] i2c:ocores: do not handle IRQ if IF is not set Federico Vaga
2018-10-21 14:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-29 8:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-10-29 14:27 ` Federico Vaga [this message]
2018-06-25 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] i2c:ocores: add polling interface Federico Vaga
2018-10-21 14:39 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-24 9:51 ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-26 17:45 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-29 8:50 ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-29 13:04 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-29 13:11 ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-25 7:47 ` Federico Vaga
2018-08-11 17:13 ` i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism Federico Vaga
2018-08-12 15:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-08-22 16:16 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-09-17 16:42 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-09-19 5:15 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-09-19 6:51 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1607303.K3FPNFt9tg@pcbe13614 \
--to=federico.vaga@cern.ch \
--cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).