From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EA3C433EF for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A80603E5 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234453AbhITWBU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:01:20 -0400 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([195.201.40.130]:35604 "EHLO lithops.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229684AbhITV7S (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 17:59:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769BC6169BCC; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:57:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 0AvcPrvAVW6r; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:57:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA726169BC6; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:57:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id DNIdiH7vl84a; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:57:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (lithops.sigma-star.at [195.201.40.130]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id C555E6108471; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:57:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:57:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Weinberger To: schaecsn@gmx.net Cc: linux-mtd , linux-kernel Message-ID: <160773399.91203.1632175069460.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> In-Reply-To: <20210920024824.9E053899858@corona.crabdance.com> References: <20210907214034.11676-1-schaecsn@gmx.net> <20210920024824.9E053899858@corona.crabdance.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ubifs: ubifs to export filesystem error counters MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Originating-IP: [195.201.40.130] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3807 (ZimbraWebClient - FF92 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3809) Thread-Topic: ubifs: ubifs to export filesystem error counters Thread-Index: NK3hz+wHsV+cRgdZv72uXipe7rZn/w== Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Stefan Schaeckeler" > An: "richard" , "linux-mtd" , "linux-kernel" > > Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 04:48:24 > Betreff: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ubifs: ubifs to export filesystem error counters > Hello mtd/ubifs, > > I just want to check back on what you think about having a sysfs for ubifs and > starting with these three callbacks > > /sys/fs/ubifs/ubiX_Y/errors_magic > /sys/fs/ubifs/ubiX_Y/errors_node > /sys/fs/ubifs/ubiX_Y/errors_crc I didn't have a chance to review your changes to far but in general I like the idea if exposing such an interface. Sorry for being a slow maintainer. Thanks, //richard