* [tip: core/rcu] tools/memory-model: Use "buf" and "flag" for message-passing tests
@ 2020-12-13 19:01 tip-bot2 for Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Paul E. McKenney @ 2020-12-13 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: Johannes Weiner, Paul E. McKenney, x86, linux-kernel
The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:
Commit-ID: acc4bdc55dcb7d7fe0be736999572a55e121873f
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/acc4bdc55dcb7d7fe0be736999572a55e121873f
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:30:11 -08:00
Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 17:25:16 -08:00
tools/memory-model: Use "buf" and "flag" for message-passing tests
The use of "x" and "y" for message-passing tests is fine for people
familiar with memory models and litmus-test nomenclature, but is a bit
obtuse for others. This commit therefore substitutes "buf" for "x" and
"flag" for "y" for the MP tests. There are a few special-case MP tests
that use locks and these are unchanged. There is another MP test that
uses pointers, and this is changed to name the pointer "p".
Reported-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus | 16 ++++++++--------
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus | 12 ++++++------
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus | 16 ++++++++--------
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus | 16 ++++++++--------
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus | 16 ++++++++--------
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus | 16 ++++++++--------
6 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus
index e04b71b..f15e501 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus
@@ -9,25 +9,25 @@ C MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce
*)
{
- int x;
- int y;
+ int buf;
+ int flag;
}
-P0(int *x, int *y)
+P0(int *buf, int *flag)
{
- WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
smp_wmb();
- WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
}
-P1(int *x, int *y)
+P1(int *buf, int *flag)
{
int r0;
int r1;
- r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
+ r0 = READ_ONCE(*flag);
smp_rmb();
- r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
+ r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus
index 18df682..ed8ee9b 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus
@@ -10,24 +10,24 @@ C MP+onceassign+derefonce
*)
{
+ int *p=y;
int x;
- int *y=z;
- int z=0;
+ int y=0;
}
-P0(int *x, int **y)
+P0(int *x, int **p)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
- rcu_assign_pointer(*y, x);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*p, x);
}
-P1(int *x, int **y)
+P1(int *x, int **p)
{
int *r0;
int r1;
rcu_read_lock();
- r0 = rcu_dereference(*y);
+ r0 = rcu_dereference(*p);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*r0);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus
index 63e0f67..4b0c2ed 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus
@@ -13,27 +13,27 @@ C MP+polocks
{
spinlock_t mylock;
- int x;
- int y;
+ int buf;
+ int flag;
}
-P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
+P0(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
- WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
spin_lock(mylock);
- WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
-P1(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
+P1(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
int r0;
int r1;
spin_lock(mylock);
- r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
+ r0 = READ_ONCE(*flag);
spin_unlock(mylock);
- r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
+ r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
index 68180a4..3010bba 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
@@ -8,23 +8,23 @@ C MP+poonceonces
*)
{
- int x;
- int y;
+ int buf;
+ int flag;
}
-P0(int *x, int *y)
+P0(int *buf, int *flag)
{
- WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
- WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
}
-P1(int *x, int *y)
+P1(int *buf, int *flag)
{
int r0;
int r1;
- r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
- r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
+ r0 = READ_ONCE(*flag);
+ r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
index 19f3e68..21e825d 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
@@ -9,23 +9,23 @@ C MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce
*)
{
- int x;
- int y;
+ int buf;
+ int flag;
}
-P0(int *x, int *y)
+P0(int *buf, int *flag)
{
- WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
- smp_store_release(y, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
+ smp_store_release(flag, 1);
}
-P1(int *x, int *y)
+P1(int *buf, int *flag)
{
int r0;
int r1;
- r0 = smp_load_acquire(y);
- r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
+ r0 = smp_load_acquire(flag);
+ r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus
index 4ac189a..9691d55 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus
@@ -13,27 +13,27 @@ C MP+porevlocks
{
spinlock_t mylock;
- int x;
- int y;
+ int buf;
+ int flag;
}
-P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
+P0(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
int r0;
int r1;
- r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
+ r0 = READ_ONCE(*flag);
spin_lock(mylock);
- r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
+ r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
-P1(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
+P1(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
spin_lock(mylock);
- WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
- WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
}
exists (0:r0=1 /\ 0:r1=0)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-12-13 19:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-13 19:01 [tip: core/rcu] tools/memory-model: Use "buf" and "flag" for message-passing tests tip-bot2 for Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).