linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/64s: Trim offlined CPUs from mm_cpumasks
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 21:04:08 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1607943765.29hccd2b8p.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7oozn06.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>

Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of December 14, 2020 8:43 pm:
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:
>> Excerpts from Geert Uytterhoeven's message of December 10, 2020 7:06 pm:
>>> Hi Nicholas,
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 4:01 AM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When offlining a CPU, powerpc/64s does not flush TLBs, rather it just
>>>> leaves the CPU set in mm_cpumasks, so it continues to receive TLBIEs
>>>> to manage its TLBs.
>>>>
>>>> However the exit_flush_lazy_tlbs() function expects that after
>>>> returning, all CPUs (except self) have flushed TLBs for that mm, in
>>>> which case TLBIEL can be used for this flush. This breaks for offline
>>>> CPUs because they don't get the IPI to flush their TLB. This can lead
>>>> to stale translations.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by clearing the CPU from mm_cpumasks, then flushing all TLBs
>>>> before going offline.
>>>>
>>>> These offlined CPU bits stuck in the cpumask also prevents the cpumask
>>>> from being trimmed back to local mode, which means continual broadcast
>>>> IPIs or TLBIEs are needed for TLB flushing. This patch prevents that
>>>> situation too.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>>> 
>>> Thanks for your patch!
>>> 
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
>>>> @@ -911,6 +911,8 @@ static int smp_core99_cpu_disable(void)
>>>>
>>>>         mpic_cpu_set_priority(0xf);
>>>>
>>>> +       cleanup_cpu_mmu_context();
>>>> +
>>> 
>>> I guess this change broke pmac32_defconfig+SMP in v5.10-rc7?
>>> 
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c: error: implicit
>>> declaration of function 'cleanup_cpu_mmu_context'
>>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]:  => 914:2
>>> 
>>> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14423174/
>>
>> Hey, yeah it does thanks for catching it. This patch fixes it for me
>>
>> ---
>> From a9b5ec92ffac975e81c6d7db6ff2b1486b2723f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 13:52:39 +1000
>> Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/32s: Fix cleanup_cpu_mmu_context() compile bug
>>
>> 32s has no tlbiel_all() defined, so just disable the cleanup with a
>> comment.
> 
> Or what about just:

That works, I kind of wanted it in there explicit that we don't
clean up on 32s. I don't mind if you prefer this though.

Thanks,
Nick

> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/mmu-hash.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/mmu-hash.h
> index 331187661236..685c589e723f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/mmu-hash.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/mmu-hash.h
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ typedef struct {
>  } mm_context_t;
> 
>  void update_bats(void);
> +static inline void cleanup_cpu_mmu_context(void) { };
> 
>  /* patch sites */
>  extern s32 patch__hash_page_A0, patch__hash_page_A1, patch__hash_page_A2;
> 
> 
> cheers
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-14 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-20  2:57 [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/64s: fix for CPU hotplug vs mm_cpumask bug Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-20  2:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] kernel/cpu: add arch override for clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() mm handling Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-20 10:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-20  2:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/64s: Trim offlined CPUs from mm_cpumasks Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-10  9:06   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-12-14  4:15     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-14 10:43       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-12-14 11:04         ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2020-12-15 10:33           ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1607943765.29hccd2b8p.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).