Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator - Hsin-hsiung Wang

From: Hsin-hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	Wen Su <wen.su@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:23:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1608024188.29527.2.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124170732.GI4933@sirena.org.uk>

Hi,

On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 17:07 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:48:07AM +0800, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> 
> > +static int mt6359_get_linear_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct mt6359_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> > +	int ret, regval;
> > +
> > +	ret = regmap_read(rdev->regmap, info->da_vsel_reg, &regval);
> > +	if (ret != 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&rdev->dev,
> > +			"Failed to get mt6359 Buck %s vsel reg: %d\n",
> > +			info->desc.name, ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = (regval >> info->da_vsel_shift) & info->da_vsel_mask;
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> This looks like it could just be regmap_get_voltage_sel_regmap()?
> Otherwise the driver looks good.

Thanks for the review.
MT6359 regulator has sel_reg and status_reg, so we use
mt6359_get_linear_voltage_sel for status_reg instead of
regmap_get_voltage_sel_regmap() which uses sel_reg.

Thanks.