linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Charan Teja Kalla <charante@codeaurora.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz, mhocko@suse.com,
	vinmenon@codeaurora.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: update the COMPACT[STALL|FAIL] events properly
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 18:19:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160ba3b5-2cd4-5ff0-1348-fb477cefd33d@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9d1dd7b-1fe7-67b6-6ba4-fb1a6faa8fae@google.com>

Thanks David for the review!!

On 2/2/2021 2:54 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021, Charan Teja Reddy wrote:
> 
>> By defination, COMPACT[STALL|FAIL] events needs to be counted when there
> 
> s/defination/definition/\

Done.

> 
>> is 'At least in one zone compaction wasn't deferred or skipped from the
>> direct compaction'. And when compaction is skipped or deferred,
>> COMPACT_SKIPPED will be returned but it will still go and update these
>> compaction events which is wrong in the sense that COMPACT[STALL|FAIL]
>> is counted without even trying the compaction.
>>
>> Correct this by skipping the counting of these events when
>> COMPACT_SKIPPED is returned for compaction. This indirectly also avoid
>> the unnecessary try into the get_page_from_freelist() when compaction is
>> not even tried.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  mm/page_alloc.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 519a60d..531f244 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -4152,6 +4152,8 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>>  	memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
>>  	psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
>>  
>> +	if (*compact_result == COMPACT_SKIPPED)
>> +		return NULL;
>>  	/*
>>  	 * At least in one zone compaction wasn't deferred or skipped, so let's
>>  	 * count a compaction stall
> 
> This makes sense, I wonder if it would also be useful to check that 
> page == NULL, either in try_to_compact_pages() or here for 
> COMPACT_SKIPPED?

In the code, when COMPACT_SKIPPED is being returned, the page will
always be NULL. So, I'm not sure how much useful it is for the page ==
NULL check here. Or I failed to understand your point here?

As, till now, COMPACTFAIL also presents page allocation failures because
of the direct compaction is skipped, creating a separate COMPACTSKIPFAIL
event which indicates that 'failed to get the free page as direct
compaction is skipped' is useful?
> 

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01 13:48 [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: update the COMPACT[STALL|FAIL] events properly Charan Teja Reddy
2021-02-01 21:24 ` David Rientjes
2021-02-02 12:49   ` Charan Teja Kalla [this message]
2021-02-05 22:28     ` David Rientjes
2021-02-06  1:57       ` Charan Teja Kalla
2021-02-09 16:08       ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=160ba3b5-2cd4-5ff0-1348-fb477cefd33d@codeaurora.org \
    --to=charante@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).