From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AC3C433E0 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F0722B37 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390160AbhAZPUU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:20:20 -0500 Received: from mail.fireflyinternet.com ([77.68.26.236]:54868 "EHLO fireflyinternet.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390639AbhAZJe2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 04:34:28 -0500 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=78.156.65.138; Received: from localhost (unverified [78.156.65.138]) by fireflyinternet.com (Firefly Internet (M1)) with ESMTP (TLS) id 23700597-1500050 for multiple; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:33:38 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <161161117911.29150.13853544418926100149@build.alporthouse.com> References: <161160687463.28991.354987542182281928@build.alporthouse.com> <20210125213348.GB196782@linux.ibm.com> <161161117911.29150.13853544418926100149@build.alporthouse.com> Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5 From: Chris Wilson Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List To: Linus Torvalds , Mike Rapoport Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:33:39 +0000 Message-ID: <161165361960.29150.15515544628767131483@build.alporthouse.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Chris Wilson (2021-01-25 21:46:19) > Quoting Mike Rapoport (2021-01-25 21:33:48) > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit > > > bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0")? > > > > I wonder, maybe actually this one is causing troubles? > > > > Chris, would it be possible to check what happens if you revert only > > bde9cfa3afe4? > > Queued for CI, will be run in about an hour. I ran just the revert of bde9cfa3afe4 through CI twice, on both occasions all machines failed to boot. -Chris