LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: syzbot+174de899852504e4a74a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	syzbot+3d1c772efafd3c38d007@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Fix clearance of Tx/Rx ring when releasing a call
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 08:47:56 +0000
Message-ID: <161234207610.653119.5287360098400436976.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)

At the end of rxrpc_release_call(), rxrpc_cleanup_ring() is called to clear
the Rx/Tx skbuff ring, but this doesn't lock the ring whilst it's accessing
it.  Unfortunately, rxrpc_resend() might be trying to retransmit a packet
concurrently with this - and whilst it does lock the ring, this isn't
protection against rxrpc_cleanup_call().

Fix this by removing the call to rxrpc_cleanup_ring() from
rxrpc_release_call().  rxrpc_cleanup_ring() will be called again anyway
from rxrpc_cleanup_call().  The earlier call is just an optimisation to
recycle skbuffs more quickly.

Alternative solutions include rxrpc_release_call() could try to cancel the
work item or wait for it to complete or rxrpc_cleanup_ring() could lock
when accessing the ring (which would require a bh lock).

This can produce a report like the following:

  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rxrpc_send_data_packet+0x19b4/0x1e70 net/rxrpc/output.c:372
  Read of size 4 at addr ffff888011606e04 by task kworker/0:0/5
  ...
  Workqueue: krxrpcd rxrpc_process_call
  Call Trace:
   ...
   kasan_report.cold+0x79/0xd5 mm/kasan/report.c:413
   rxrpc_send_data_packet+0x19b4/0x1e70 net/rxrpc/output.c:372
   rxrpc_resend net/rxrpc/call_event.c:266 [inline]
   rxrpc_process_call+0x1634/0x1f60 net/rxrpc/call_event.c:412
   process_one_work+0x98d/0x15f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2275
   ...

  Allocated by task 2318:
   ...
   sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x793/0x920 net/core/sock.c:2348
   rxrpc_send_data+0xb51/0x2bf0 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:358
   rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc03/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:744
   rxrpc_sendmsg+0x420/0x630 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:560
   ...

  Freed by task 2318:
   ...
   kfree_skb+0x140/0x3f0 net/core/skbuff.c:704
   rxrpc_free_skb+0x11d/0x150 net/rxrpc/skbuff.c:78
   rxrpc_cleanup_ring net/rxrpc/call_object.c:485 [inline]
   rxrpc_release_call+0x5dd/0x860 net/rxrpc/call_object.c:552
   rxrpc_release_calls_on_socket+0x21c/0x300 net/rxrpc/call_object.c:579
   rxrpc_release_sock net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:885 [inline]
   rxrpc_release+0x263/0x5a0 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:916
   __sock_release+0xcd/0x280 net/socket.c:597
   ...

  The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888011606dc0
   which belongs to the cache skbuff_head_cache of size 232

Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Reported-by: syzbot+174de899852504e4a74a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+3d1c772efafd3c38d007@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
---

 net/rxrpc/call_object.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
index c845594b663f..4eb91d958a48 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
@@ -548,8 +548,6 @@ void rxrpc_release_call(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct rxrpc_call *call)
 		rxrpc_disconnect_call(call);
 	if (call->security)
 		call->security->free_call_crypto(call);
-
-	rxrpc_cleanup_ring(call);
 	_leave("");
 }
 



             reply index

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-03  8:47 David Howells [this message]
2021-02-05  2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=161234207610.653119.5287360098400436976.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+174de899852504e4a74a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzbot+3d1c772efafd3c38d007@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8 lkml/git/8.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9 lkml/git/9.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \
		linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index lkml

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git