From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3ADC433E6 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F7A64DEE for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235177AbhBJCKo (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:10:44 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44188 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234644AbhBJAy6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 19:54:58 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFF2364E54; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:54:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1612918457; bh=cW3qYYfH4q/8re3Ex8OZxsVP8E02KQVHm4+lDC21aFc=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=mOq0ULodlxWJ/tc1Xexx8Bpdz9hkfxT4OqQACU0MkAATQ37gmb8A5nlLJE1gUKjIi 8gV2n9DPlvX1Arl/mu/pjZjMtHOn4pBxGpioMGbEGDd+EBvCtj3LYaYJcJD5jNlvjG bDvvOtDXHRtSw9nK/CLQGJ+viZcYSolcKUGZNljLWqRNPmhUDITX8erunLpCoJkO58 uqovedqMurBfO0nk/+v8edgK6cthcT81Pwv4dNUaoytJmIbklhYL4lFIKbghNpgtNY Xg8TGS4uDUclqFHw4D7ePm4GU7XjzsosWmoxfyuq7jTpfDlGGdtXCS9CHdZySdpPUD HTQiULX9rOIww== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <5bc4f5b7-5370-bdd5-143e-429c83447ce1@microchip.com> References: <20210203154332.470587-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> <5bc4f5b7-5370-bdd5-143e-429c83447ce1@microchip.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks From: Stephen Boyd Cc: mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com, a.fatoum@pengutronix.de, krzk@kernel.org, Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, saravanak@google.com Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 16:54:15 -0800 Message-ID: <161291845517.418021.17378265940034341908@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com (2021-02-08 01:49:45) > Hi, Michael, Stephen, >=20 > Do you plan to take this patch for v5.12? > If fw_devlink will remain set to ON for v5.12, some of our boards will > no longer boot without this patch. Is fw_devlink defaulted to on for v5.12?