From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD31EC433DB for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEB664DDA for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230353AbhBKTUU (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:20:20 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38124 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229553AbhBKTUQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:20:16 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82CE364DEC; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:19:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1613071175; bh=/Xi5MgzQdyZzamI/PYQu74aK/EMKSW4dbTMwe8emdRI=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=I9MMM+gv/OcX4WiiksCAigl0oEaKW7w5jaSK6eFRSTv1YMO7r1nCas/LlK4vx8TNX HYt66sDs0VBk71HbnchLSXxXhvvptGfPxnklIiLBayqmReaRVGag1dRYRpwf699Nr+ klddIUZpFFmWcnKo9P8QIfe7y1sLCeO+m3lyBM7uunTrr14FvChVpAX9X64WkOISPP Xk2+DYRDtb3vmwhGrNFwlmIYQgd1wadaWHcHp19IL7Jl8XxXwXLvLm5x8B3kAmAo3V oShgCsJGChbU1Ki/aywbmw6Pcl+6nK8KzgRUYQl0YEvXqRFa/P3Ilegd0E9aAqzx3o Cl6OWW7Kwc5UQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <61854037cd4d3ac367cfda3f02fd1557b1b3bb8b.1612153322.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> References: <61854037cd4d3ac367cfda3f02fd1557b1b3bb8b.1612153322.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] opp: Don't ignore clk_get() errors other than -ENOENT From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Viresh Kumar , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , Rafael Wysocki , Dmitry Osipenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon , Viresh Kumar , Viresh Kumar Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:19:34 -0800 Message-ID: <161307117419.1254594.16016042022739644084@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Viresh Kumar (2021-01-31 20:22:58) > Not all devices that need to use OPP core need to have clocks, a missing > clock is fine in which case -ENOENT shall be returned by clk_get(). >=20 > Anything else is an error and must be handled properly. >=20 > Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- > V2: > - s/ENODEV/ENOENT > - Use dev_err_probe() >=20 > Stephen, is the understanding correct that -ENOENT is the only error > returned for missing clocks ? Yeah pretty much. See clk_get_optional().