From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265574AbTGKUzd (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 16:55:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265421AbTGKUzd (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 16:55:33 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:10942 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265574AbTGKUz2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 16:55:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16143.10146.718830.585351@charged.uio.no> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 23:09:54 +0200 To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Jeff Garzik , Alan Cox , Christoph Hellwig , lkml Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.22-pre5 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact postmaster@uio.no if you have questions about this scanning. X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Marcelo Tosatti writes: >> Is there still any chance for the NFS O_DIRECT support to make >> it? > I guess the best way of doing so would be adding ->direct_io2 > and KERNEL24_HAS_ODIRECT_2 define. That is what the last patch I sent you does (also sent to l-k). Should I resend? Cheers, Trond