From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C453C433E0 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 04:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B21A600CC for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 04:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233406AbhCAEWw (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Feb 2021 23:22:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50284 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233381AbhCAEWf (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Feb 2021 23:22:35 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B410CC061788 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:21:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id s16so9064016plr.9 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:21:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references :subject:from:cc:to:date:message-id:user-agent; bh=NjN8Uc4qcy6FksZqQ1QHgGaJrHny90tByxw9vbwCOUo=; b=PfsZPlWhBn8pZsUVWOFcD20gH5ailRvQvDC6DSLnpucjO8Hn5TM6j7hAxblpnxh/ww h19tg/qridAAO0JbIjYEqlPjlq1M2aUsyn5Xtx2azr7AZwaHOgP4D8t9TnL0gshPQprl IVliQU0Wp2qRY0XqD+/6i8P0dUy5LqmFSGF/4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:references:subject:from:cc:to:date:message-id :user-agent; bh=NjN8Uc4qcy6FksZqQ1QHgGaJrHny90tByxw9vbwCOUo=; b=IPB0Cv+f8/Impts1yMqwBF9wNCaDkqqiMei1uAn7MGJ6SqnOAWwuDq6QM5jxoHtULh 1xqXmn9LKUT4BBdaaqa3T5NjcRPcgD8nhilxrh9O0xKlz+MRgwX7ld3oXfWbSpUJAYtS SS1njVpnUMoihZd5X5tMVCnftyRYCKUGkyWOephOSOy66T4F+JAGIr8ki4dH9+f/jnBa J48GRVDeQ7zWTQyog3DSi3fwoM+CktvmoBf/IWk4KSI/AxIhcjGZZqy46tMTIHoz2ylg EXnKUzLZufI8j6L0HBCsnOrihj7sKQ63Kq9EVDjYkx8FBI6MsuYqBBeKiG9Moz7H/bxQ NBZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5307D4EfU3iCJnlrJCBB/t3edVXWtzrnSdPCCILO3lJLZTeru4hu NIefWvkYNTgvSvkzk8vIx/ZkaQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkJzEI6yu3W1UgBfWt0bhhbDNa9CtCsRIPj1jn7oK8x+Mt6RNsDO6AOQ4URYdLK9AzZjnIpg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:31cf:: with SMTP id j15mr5674186pjf.41.1614572514205; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:21:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from chromium.org ([2620:15c:202:201:3c20:df33:e36:93df]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i22sm8751971pjz.56.2021.02.28.20.21.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:21:53 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <48278c3db41c3f46eac8892d1383444c@codeaurora.org> References: <161428185152.1254594.1426736986245389798@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <161436514295.1254594.2789904935200051795@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <48278c3db41c3f46eac8892d1383444c@codeaurora.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Rajendra Nayak , Sibi Sankar To: Sai Prakash Ranjan Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:21:52 -0800 Message-ID: <161457251211.1254594.17265407085456881480@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-27 05:58:25) > On 2021-02-27 00:15, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-26 00:04:27) > >> On 2021-02-26 01:07, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 01:30:19) > >> >> Add a DT node for Last level cache (aka. system cache) > >> >> controller which provides control over the last level > >> >> cache present on SC7280 SoC. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan > >> >> --- > >> > > >> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd > >> > > >> > Should add system-cache-controller to the devicetree spec. Or just u= se > >> > cache-controller for the node name. > >>=20 > >> This was as per discussion in [1][2] where dt-schema throws an error > >> since it expects cache-level to be associated with cache-controller. > >>=20 > >=20 > > Ah right. Can you add system-cache-controller to the dt spec? >=20 > Sure, I'll add it. Hopefully that won't have to block this change? > Because I might need some time to get permissions to add it there. >=20 Doesn't block it for me.