From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/urgent] static_call: Align static_call_is_init() patching condition
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:25:08 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161615670801.398.11880263831906331601.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210318113610.636651340@infradead.org>
The following commit has been merged into the locking/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 698bacefe993ad2922c9d3b1380591ad489355e9
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/698bacefe993ad2922c9d3b1380591ad489355e9
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:29:56 +01:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:16:44 +01:00
static_call: Align static_call_is_init() patching condition
The intent is to avoid writing init code after init (because the text
might have been freed). The code is needlessly different between
jump_label and static_call and not obviously correct.
The existing code relies on the fact that the module loader clears the
init layout, such that within_module_init() always fails, while
jump_label relies on the module state which is more obvious and
matches the kernel logic.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318113610.636651340@infradead.org
---
kernel/static_call.c | 14 ++++----------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/static_call.c b/kernel/static_call.c
index 080c8a9..fc22590 100644
--- a/kernel/static_call.c
+++ b/kernel/static_call.c
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ void __static_call_update(struct static_call_key *key, void *tramp, void *func)
};
for (site_mod = &first; site_mod; site_mod = site_mod->next) {
+ bool init = system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING;
struct module *mod = site_mod->mod;
if (!site_mod->sites) {
@@ -168,6 +169,7 @@ void __static_call_update(struct static_call_key *key, void *tramp, void *func)
if (mod) {
stop = mod->static_call_sites +
mod->num_static_call_sites;
+ init = mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING;
}
#endif
@@ -175,16 +177,8 @@ void __static_call_update(struct static_call_key *key, void *tramp, void *func)
site < stop && static_call_key(site) == key; site++) {
void *site_addr = static_call_addr(site);
- if (static_call_is_init(site)) {
- /*
- * Don't write to call sites which were in
- * initmem and have since been freed.
- */
- if (!mod && system_state >= SYSTEM_RUNNING)
- continue;
- if (mod && !within_module_init((unsigned long)site_addr, mod))
- continue;
- }
+ if (!init && static_call_is_init(site))
+ continue;
if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long)site_addr)) {
WARN_ONCE(1, "can't patch static call site at %pS",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-19 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 11:31 [PATCH 0/3] static_call() vs __exit fixes Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 11:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] static_call: Fix static_call_set_init() Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 12:25 ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 11:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] static_call: Align static_call_is_init() patching condition Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 12:25 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-03-19 13:31 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-03-19 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 14:40 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-03-19 15:44 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-03-22 16:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 11:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] static_call: Fix static_call_update() sanity check Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 11:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 16:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-18 16:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 18:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-19 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 20:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-22 14:50 ` Jessica Yu
2021-03-22 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-22 17:36 ` Jessica Yu
2021-03-22 13:07 ` Jessica Yu
2021-03-22 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 12:25 ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 12:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] static_call() vs __exit fixes Sumit Garg
2021-03-18 19:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161615670801.398.11880263831906331601.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).