From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271191AbTG2ARi (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 20:17:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271199AbTG2ARi (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 20:17:38 -0400 Received: from eidolon.muppetlabs.com ([64.81.31.173]:56757 "EHLO eidolon.muppetlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271191AbTG2ARg (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 20:17:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16165.48414.123242.660524@eidolon.muppetlabs.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:17:34 -0700 From: Brian Raiter To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-assembly@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The Well-Factored 386 In-Reply-To: <20030728133300.2ef96cf4.davem@redhat.com> References: <20030728070658.343ed2b0.davem@redhat.com> <20030728133300.2ef96cf4.davem@redhat.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Rick, I wish you luck finding another machine with lists to > infiltrate. > > Because you're not going to do it on vger.kernel.org any more. > Bye bye. I've no doubt that his posts seemed off-topic for linux-kernel, I would argue that they are certainly on-topic for linux-assembly. (I also imagine the latter sees much less traffic than the former, thus hp's comment.) I rather doubt that the complaints were coming from both lists, given that his stuff is far more interesting that the usual linux-assembly posts ("how do I write a number to screen without using BIOS?!") Assuming this is true, perhaps it would make more sense to allow him to continue posting to linux-assembly? b