From: Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Martin Konold <martin.konold@erfrakon.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:43:22 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16176.13066.601441.179810@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030804232654.295c9255.akpm@osdl.org>
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
Andrew> Martin Konold <martin.konold@erfrakon.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when using 2.6.0.test1 on a high end laptop (P-IV 2.2 GHz, 1GB RAM)
>> I notice very significant slowdown in interactive usage compared to
>> 2.4.21.
>>
>> The difference is most easily seen when switching folders in
>> kmail. While 2.4.21 is instantaneous 2.6.0.test1 shows the clock
>> for about 2-3 seconds.
>>
I see the same problem, and I'm using XFS. Booting with
elevator=deadline fixed it for me. The anticipatory scheduler hurts
if you have a disc optimised for low power consumption, not speed.
--
Dr Peter Chubb http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au peterc AT gelato.unsw.edu.au
You are lost in a maze of BitKeeper repositories, all slightly different.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-05 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-05 5:04 Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21 Martin Konold
2003-08-05 5:16 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-05 6:26 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-05 8:16 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-05 22:43 ` Peter Chubb [this message]
2003-08-05 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-06 0:55 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-05 7:23 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-08-05 12:52 ` Bernd Schubert
2003-08-05 13:37 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-08-05 21:29 ` Martin Konold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16176.13066.601441.179810@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au \
--to=peter@chubb.wattle.id.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.konold@erfrakon.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).