linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <olteanv@gmail.com>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<andriin@fb.com>, <edumazet@google.com>, <weiwan@google.com>,
	<cong.wang@bytedance.com>, <ap420073@gmail.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@openeuler.org>, <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	<linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	<andrii@kernel.org>, <kafai@fb.com>, <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	<yhs@fb.com>, <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <jonas.bonn@netrounds.com>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <mzhivich@akamai.com>, <johunt@akamai.com>,
	<albcamus@gmail.com>, <kehuan.feng@gmail.com>,
	<a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>, <atenart@kernel.org>,
	<alexander.duyck@gmail.com>, <hdanton@sina.com>,
	<jgross@suse.com>, <JKosina@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v4 1/2] net: sched: fix packet stuck problem for lockless qdisc
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 09:16:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1618535809-11952-2-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1618535809-11952-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>

Lockless qdisc has below concurrent problem:
    cpu0                 cpu1
     .                     .
q->enqueue                 .
     .                     .
qdisc_run_begin()          .
     .                     .
dequeue_skb()              .
     .                     .
sch_direct_xmit()          .
     .                     .
     .                q->enqueue
     .             qdisc_run_begin()
     .            return and do nothing
     .                     .
qdisc_run_end()            .

cpu1 enqueue a skb without calling __qdisc_run() because cpu0
has not released the lock yet and spin_trylock() return false
for cpu1 in qdisc_run_begin(), and cpu0 do not see the skb
enqueued by cpu1 when calling dequeue_skb() because cpu1 may
enqueue the skb after cpu0 calling dequeue_skb() and before
cpu0 calling qdisc_run_end().

Lockless qdisc has below another concurrent problem when
tx_action is involved:

cpu0(serving tx_action)     cpu1             cpu2
          .                   .                .
          .              q->enqueue            .
          .            qdisc_run_begin()       .
          .              dequeue_skb()         .
          .                   .            q->enqueue
          .                   .                .
          .             sch_direct_xmit()      .
          .                   .         qdisc_run_begin()
          .                   .       return and do nothing
          .                   .                .
 clear __QDISC_STATE_SCHED    .                .
 qdisc_run_begin()            .                .
 return and do nothing        .                .
          .                   .                .
          .            qdisc_run_end()         .

This patch fixes the above data race by:
1. Test STATE_MISSED before doing spin_trylock().
2. If the first spin_trylock() return false and STATE_MISSED is
   not set before the first spin_trylock(), Set STATE_MISSED and
   retry another spin_trylock() in case other CPU may not see
   STATE_MISSED after it releases the lock.
3. reschedule if STATE_MISSED is set after the lock is released
   at the end of qdisc_run_end().

For tx_action case, STATE_MISSED is also set when cpu1 is at the
end if qdisc_run_end(), so tx_action will be rescheduled again
to dequeue the skb enqueued by cpu2.

Clear STATE_MISSED before retrying a dequeuing when dequeuing
returns NULL in order to reduce the overhead of the above double
spin_trylock() and __netif_schedule() calling.

The performance impact of this patch, tested using pktgen and
dummy netdev with pfifo_fast qdisc attached:

 threads  without+this_patch   with+this_patch      delta
    1        2.61Mpps            2.60Mpps           -0.3%
    2        3.97Mpps            3.82Mpps           -3.7%
    4        5.62Mpps            5.59Mpps           -0.5%
    8        2.78Mpps            2.77Mpps           -0.3%
   16        2.22Mpps            2.22Mpps           -0.0%

Fixes: 6b3ba9146fe6 ("net: sched: allow qdiscs to handle locking")
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
V4: Change STATE_NEED_RESCHEDULE to STATE_MISSED mirroring
    NAPI's NAPIF_STATE_MISSED, and add Juergen's "Tested-by"
    tag for there is only renaming and typo fixing between
    V4 and V3.
V3: Fix a compile error and a few comment typo, remove the
    __QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED checking, and update the
    performance data.
V2: Avoid the overhead of fixing the data race as much as
    possible.
---
 include/net/sch_generic.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 net/sched/sch_generic.c   | 12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
index f7a6e14..b85b8ea 100644
--- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
+++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct qdisc_rate_table {
 enum qdisc_state_t {
 	__QDISC_STATE_SCHED,
 	__QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED,
+	__QDISC_STATE_MISSED,
 };
 
 struct qdisc_size_table {
@@ -159,8 +160,37 @@ static inline bool qdisc_is_empty(const struct Qdisc *qdisc)
 static inline bool qdisc_run_begin(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
 {
 	if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK) {
+		bool dont_retry = test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_MISSED,
+					   &qdisc->state);
+
+		if (spin_trylock(&qdisc->seqlock))
+			goto nolock_empty;
+
+		/* If the flag is set before doing the spin_trylock() and
+		 * the above spin_trylock() return false, it means other cpu
+		 * holding the lock will do dequeuing for us, or it wil see
+		 * the flag set after releasing lock and reschedule the
+		 * net_tx_action() to do the dequeuing.
+		 */
+		if (dont_retry)
+			return false;
+
+		/* We could do set_bit() before the first spin_trylock(),
+		 * and avoid doing second spin_trylock() completely, then
+		 * we could have multi cpus doing the set_bit(). Here use
+		 * dont_retry to avoid doing the set_bit() and the second
+		 * spin_trylock(), which has 5% performance improvement than
+		 * doing the set_bit() before the first spin_trylock().
+		 */
+		set_bit(__QDISC_STATE_MISSED, &qdisc->state);
+
+		/* Retry again in case other CPU may not see the new flag
+		 * after it releases the lock at the end of qdisc_run_end().
+		 */
 		if (!spin_trylock(&qdisc->seqlock))
 			return false;
+
+nolock_empty:
 		WRITE_ONCE(qdisc->empty, false);
 	} else if (qdisc_is_running(qdisc)) {
 		return false;
@@ -176,8 +206,13 @@ static inline bool qdisc_run_begin(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
 static inline void qdisc_run_end(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
 {
 	write_seqcount_end(&qdisc->running);
-	if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK)
+	if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK) {
 		spin_unlock(&qdisc->seqlock);
+
+		if (unlikely(test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_MISSED,
+				      &qdisc->state)))
+			__netif_schedule(qdisc);
+	}
 }
 
 static inline bool qdisc_may_bulk(const struct Qdisc *qdisc)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index 44991ea..9bc73ea 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -640,8 +640,10 @@ static struct sk_buff *pfifo_fast_dequeue(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
 {
 	struct pfifo_fast_priv *priv = qdisc_priv(qdisc);
 	struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
+	bool need_retry = true;
 	int band;
 
+retry:
 	for (band = 0; band < PFIFO_FAST_BANDS && !skb; band++) {
 		struct skb_array *q = band2list(priv, band);
 
@@ -652,6 +654,16 @@ static struct sk_buff *pfifo_fast_dequeue(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
 	}
 	if (likely(skb)) {
 		qdisc_update_stats_at_dequeue(qdisc, skb);
+	} else if (need_retry &&
+		   test_and_clear_bit(__QDISC_STATE_MISSED,
+				      &qdisc->state)) {
+		/* do another dequeuing after clearing the flag to
+		 * avoid calling __netif_schedule().
+		 */
+		smp_mb__after_atomic();
+		need_retry = false;
+
+		goto retry;
 	} else {
 		WRITE_ONCE(qdisc->empty, true);
 	}
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16  1:16 [PATCH net v4 0/2] fix packet stuck problem for lockless qdisc Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-16  1:16 ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2021-04-19 15:29   ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] net: sched: " Michal Kubecek
2021-04-19 23:55     ` Michal Kubecek
2021-04-20  2:23       ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-20 20:34       ` Michal Kubecek
2021-04-21  1:52         ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-21  5:31           ` Michal Kubecek
2021-04-21  8:21             ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-21  8:44               ` Michal Kubecek
2021-04-21  9:25                 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-23  9:42                   ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-30  3:11                     ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-30  3:15                       ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-30  6:28                         ` Michal Kubecek
2021-04-16  1:16 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] net: sched: fix endless tx action reschedule during deactivation Yunsheng Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1618535809-11952-2-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=JKosina@suse.com \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=albcamus@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=johunt@akamai.com \
    --cc=jonas.bonn@netrounds.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kehuan.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=mzhivich@akamai.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=weiwan@google.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).