From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B56C48BCD for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296ED6054E for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229865AbhFIUsi (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:48:38 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:42430 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229639AbhFIUsg (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:48:36 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97B3ED1; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 07FD63F719; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:46:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Cristian Marussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Add delayed response status check Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 21:46:34 +0100 Message-Id: <162327154478.2648287.13789567557699425300.b4-ty@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210608103056.3388-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20210608103056.3388-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 11:30:56 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > A successfully received delayed response could anyway report a failure at > the protocol layer in the message status field. > > Add a check also for this error condition. Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (master), thanks! [1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Add delayed response status check https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/f1748b1ee1 -- Regards, Sudeep