linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Remove MSR_PR check in interrupt_exit_{user/kernel}_prepare()
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:08:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1628064412.48kzr1eula.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b36623df00ef3d2296f928487b6e23f93a217afa.1628054802.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of August 4, 2021 3:27 pm:
> In those hot functions that are called at every interrupt, any saved
> cycle is worth it.
> 
> interrupt_exit_user_prepare() and interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare() are
> called from three places:
> - From entry_32.S
> - From interrupt_64.S
> - From interrupt_exit_user_restart() and interrupt_exit_kernel_restart()
> 
> In entry_32.S, there are inambiguously called based on MSR_PR:
> 
> 	interrupt_return:
> 		lwz	r4,_MSR(r1)
> 		addi	r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> 		andi.	r0,r4,MSR_PR
> 		beq	.Lkernel_interrupt_return
> 		bl	interrupt_exit_user_prepare
> 	...
> 	.Lkernel_interrupt_return:
> 		bl	interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare
> 
> In interrupt_64.S, that's similar:
> 
> 	interrupt_return_\srr\():
> 		ld	r4,_MSR(r1)
> 		andi.	r0,r4,MSR_PR
> 		beq	interrupt_return_\srr\()_kernel
> 	interrupt_return_\srr\()_user: /* make backtraces match the _kernel variant */
> 		addi	r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> 		bl	interrupt_exit_user_prepare
> 	...
> 	interrupt_return_\srr\()_kernel:
> 		addi	r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> 		bl	interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare
> 
> In interrupt_exit_user_restart() and interrupt_exit_kernel_restart(),
> MSR_PR is verified respectively by BUG_ON(!user_mode(regs)) and
> BUG_ON(user_mode(regs)) prior to calling interrupt_exit_user_prepare()
> and interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare().
> 
> The verification in interrupt_exit_user_prepare() and
> interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare() are therefore useless and can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

Probably okay to do now things are ironing out.

Unless we want to make a new define for interrupt handler debug and put 
a bunch of these asserts under it. There's quite a lot more here, and
in asm/interrupt.h, etc.

Thanks,
Nick

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
> index 21bbd615ca41..f26caf911ab5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
> @@ -465,7 +465,6 @@ notrace unsigned long interrupt_exit_user_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  
>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOKE) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_40x))
>  		BUG_ON(!(regs->msr & MSR_RI));
> -	BUG_ON(!(regs->msr & MSR_PR));
>  	BUG_ON(arch_irq_disabled_regs(regs));
>  	CT_WARN_ON(ct_state() == CONTEXT_USER);
>  
> @@ -499,7 +498,6 @@ notrace unsigned long interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOKE) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_40x) &&
>  	    unlikely(!(regs->msr & MSR_RI)))
>  		unrecoverable_exception(regs);
> -	BUG_ON(regs->msr & MSR_PR);
>  	/*
>  	 * CT_WARN_ON comes here via program_check_exception,
>  	 * so avoid recursion.
> -- 
> 2.25.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-04  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-04  5:27 [PATCH] powerpc: Remove MSR_PR check in interrupt_exit_{user/kernel}_prepare() Christophe Leroy
2021-08-04  8:08 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2021-08-04  8:37   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-04  8:53     ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1628064412.48kzr1eula.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).