From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E638C432BE for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246F1611AD for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243153AbhHFBKf (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 21:10:35 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56118 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243145AbhHFBKe (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 21:10:34 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD5B661179; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:10:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1628212220; bh=nT9ry6c4LrsiJQ8cWoGAK0iM4DrJwicfZg25683t/dM=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=jAJw5sXxe5TUBzcneaByqTfHf2AH5PNzEHKBmReDMxB6a++i4z4KcTYyEn3JFz/K5 fKXS4nDByIBt3KZUnW5bHEYU77xgzXFr8w3XRsdBvIg2+KKbrg29JC18pFtn5RKgza Mg/XrgRPpj8WSYML14ou9xUNIw/3+g+Hf+5aYGbalYoKB9jR5CGCIr4hluEzYB4OXL GQMKGE8uWEYMZ5HTuohCJcI+v8ZZYCHfaZpu2Km3zPRaLWh/fZ0/dUvqyonVd7wIwv 92gCJiwBHsvpra+vfSDeoB1SJAms3K1dnXh/BXhDBvN9ZqpIhVPqt3ROzvccEw8RL1 9sMFnMJZtho8w== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20210702225145.2643303-4-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> References: <20210702225145.2643303-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> <20210702225145.2643303-4-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] clk: bcm2835: Switch to clk_divider.determine_rate From: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Blumenstingl , Marek Szyprowski , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Florian Fainelli , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Martin Blumenstingl , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 18:10:18 -0700 Message-ID: <162821221874.19113.16738014912388895260@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Martin Blumenstingl (2021-07-02 15:51:42) > .determine_rate is meant to replace .round_rate in CCF in the future. > Switch over to .determine_rate now that clk_divider_ops has gained > support for that. >=20 > Cc: Marek Szyprowski > Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > Cc: Florian Fainelli > Cc: Ray Jui > Cc: Scott Branden > Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com > Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl > --- Applied to clk-next