linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: irq/core] PCI/MSI: Protect msi_desc::masked for multi-MSI
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:07:43 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <162858646392.395.7473987007081892890.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210729222542.726833414@linutronix.de>

The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     77e89afc25f30abd56e76a809ee2884d7c1b63ce
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/77e89afc25f30abd56e76a809ee2884d7c1b63ce
Author:        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:51:47 +02:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:59:20 +02:00

PCI/MSI: Protect msi_desc::masked for multi-MSI

Multi-MSI uses a single MSI descriptor and there is a single mask register
when the device supports per vector masking. To avoid reading back the mask
register the value is cached in the MSI descriptor and updates are done by
clearing and setting bits in the cache and writing it to the device.

But nothing protects msi_desc::masked and the mask register from being
modified concurrently on two different CPUs for two different Linux
interrupts which belong to the same multi-MSI descriptor.

Add a lock to struct device and protect any operation on the mask and the
mask register with it.

This makes the update of msi_desc::masked unconditional, but there is no
place which requires a modification of the hardware register without
updating the masked cache.

msi_mask_irq() is now an empty wrapper which will be cleaned up in follow
up changes.

The problem goes way back to the initial support of multi-MSI, but picking
the commit which introduced the mask cache is a valid cut off point
(2.6.30).

Fixes: f2440d9acbe8 ("PCI MSI: Refactor interrupt masking code")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210729222542.726833414@linutronix.de

---
 drivers/base/core.c    |  1 +
 drivers/pci/msi.c      | 19 ++++++++++---------
 include/linux/device.h |  1 +
 include/linux/msi.h    |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index f636049..6c0ef9d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -2837,6 +2837,7 @@ void device_initialize(struct device *dev)
 	device_pm_init(dev);
 	set_dev_node(dev, -1);
 #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&dev->msi_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->msi_list);
 #endif
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->links.consumers);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index f0f7026..e5e7533 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -143,24 +143,25 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ u32 msi_mask(unsigned x)
  * reliably as devices without an INTx disable bit will then generate a
  * level IRQ which will never be cleared.
  */
-u32 __pci_msi_desc_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
+void __pci_msi_desc_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
 {
-	u32 mask_bits = desc->masked;
+	raw_spinlock_t *lock = &desc->dev->msi_lock;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (pci_msi_ignore_mask || !desc->msi_attrib.maskbit)
-		return 0;
+		return;
 
-	mask_bits &= ~mask;
-	mask_bits |= flag;
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+	desc->masked &= ~mask;
+	desc->masked |= flag;
 	pci_write_config_dword(msi_desc_to_pci_dev(desc), desc->mask_pos,
-			       mask_bits);
-
-	return mask_bits;
+			       desc->masked);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
 {
-	desc->masked = __pci_msi_desc_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
+	__pci_msi_desc_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
 }
 
 static void __iomem *pci_msix_desc_addr(struct msi_desc *desc)
diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
index 59940f1..e53aa50 100644
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -506,6 +506,7 @@ struct device {
 	struct dev_pin_info	*pins;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
+	raw_spinlock_t		msi_lock;
 	struct list_head	msi_list;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_OPS
diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
index 6aff469..e8bdcb8 100644
--- a/include/linux/msi.h
+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ void __pci_read_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
 void __pci_write_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
 
 u32 __pci_msix_desc_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag);
-u32 __pci_msi_desc_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag);
+void __pci_msi_desc_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag);
 void pci_msi_mask_irq(struct irq_data *data);
 void pci_msi_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *data);
 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-10  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-29 21:51 [patch V2 00/19] PCI/MSI, x86: Cure a couple of inconsistencies Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 01/19] PCI/MSI: Enable and mask MSI-X early Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 02/19] PCI/MSI: Mask all unused MSI-X entries Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 03/19] PCI/MSI: Enforce that MSI-X table entry is masked for update Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 04/19] PCI/MSI: Enforce MSI[X] entry updates to be visible Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 05/19] PCI/MSI: Do not set invalid bits in MSI mask Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 06/19] PCI/MSI: Correct misleading comments Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 07/19] PCI/MSI: Use msi_mask_irq() in pci_msi_shutdown() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 08/19] PCI/MSI: Protect msi_desc::masked for multi-MSI Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 09/19] genirq: Provide IRQCHIP_AFFINITY_PRE_STARTUP Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 10/19] x86/ioapic: Force affinity setup before startup Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 11/19] x86/msi: " Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 12/19] s390/pci: Do not mask MSI[-X] entries on teardown Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-03 12:48   ` Niklas Schnelle
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 13/19] PCI/MSI: Simplify msi_verify_entries() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 14/19] PCI/MSI: Rename msi_desc::masked Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 15/19] PCI/MSI: Consolidate error handling in msi_capability_init() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 16/19] PCI/MSI: Deobfuscate virtual MSI-X Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 17/19] PCI/MSI: Cleanup msi_mask() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 18/19] PCI/MSI: Provide a new set of mask and unmask functions Thomas Gleixner
     [not found]   ` <87r1f6bpt7.wl-maz@kernel.org>
2021-08-09 18:56     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-09 19:08       ` [patch V3 " Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07         ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-29 21:51 ` [patch V2 19/19] PCI/MSI: Use new mask/unmask functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  9:07   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-10  7:49 ` [patch V2 00/19] PCI/MSI, x86: Cure a couple of inconsistencies Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=162858646392.395.7473987007081892890.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [tip: irq/core] PCI/MSI: Protect msi_desc::masked for multi-MSI' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).