From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@somainline.org>,
Pavel Dubrova <pashadubrova@gmail.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm660: Remove transient global "xo" clock
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:34:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <163061129079.405991.11763080753220412244@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YTDMHq3rLUrldNfB@Marijn-Arch-Book.localdomain>
Quoting Marijn Suijten (2021-09-02 06:05:34)
> On 2021-09-01 20:46:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Marijn Suijten (2021-09-01 01:57:15)
> > > On 2021-08-31 22:35:56, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > Quoting Marijn Suijten (2021-08-30 11:24:45)
> > > > > The DSI PHY/PLL was relying on a global "xo" clock to be found, but the
> > > > > real clock is named "xo_board" in the DT. The standard nowadays is to
> > > > > never use global clock names anymore but require the firmware (DT) to
> > > > > provide every clock binding explicitly with .fw_name. The DSI PLLs have
> > > > > since been converted to this mechanism (specifically 14nm for SDM660)
> > > > > and this transient clock can now be removed.
> > > > >
> > > > > This issue was originally discovered in:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/386db1a6-a1cd-3c7d-a88e-dc83f8a1be96@somainline.org/
> > > > > and prevented the removal of "xo" at that time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Presumably this wants to go with the first one.
> > >
> > > What are you referring to with "the first one"? This patch can only go
> > > in after patch 1/2 of this series, unless you are suggesting to squash
> > > it with Bjorns cleanup and making sure that lands after the fix in the
> > > DSI?
> >
> > The first patch in this series.
>
> Are you suggesting to squash this patch into the first patch in this
> series? Note that the first patch touches drm/msm/dsi, the second
> (this) patch touches clk/qcom.
No.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-02 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-30 18:24 [PATCH v2 0/2] Use "ref" clocks from firmware for DSI PLL VCO parent Marijn Suijten
2021-08-30 18:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use "ref" fw clock instead of global name for " Marijn Suijten
2021-08-30 22:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-30 22:45 ` Marijn Suijten
2021-08-30 22:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-30 23:10 ` Marijn Suijten
2021-09-01 5:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-09-01 8:49 ` Marijn Suijten
2021-09-02 3:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-09-02 7:27 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-08-30 18:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm660: Remove transient global "xo" clock Marijn Suijten
2021-09-01 5:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-09-01 8:57 ` Marijn Suijten
2021-09-02 3:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-09-02 13:05 ` Marijn Suijten
2021-09-02 19:34 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2021-09-02 7:28 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=163061129079.405991.11763080753220412244@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=abhinavk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jami.kettunen@somainline.org \
--cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=martin.botka@somainline.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=pashadubrova@gmail.com \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).