linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	andrealmeid@collabora.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] futex: Rename {,__}{,un}queue_me()
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 10:07:16 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <163377403644.25758.6861294518686818049.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210923171111.300673-4-andrealmeid@collabora.com>

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     bce760d34bc2adcfd97e859a91407df51913f7b0
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/bce760d34bc2adcfd97e859a91407df51913f7b0
Author:        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:10:52 -03:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:51:08 +02:00

futex: Rename {,__}{,un}queue_me()

In order to prepare introducing these symbols into the global
namespace; rename them:

  s/\<\(__\)*\(un\)*queue_me/\1futex_\2queue/g

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210923171111.300673-4-andrealmeid@collabora.com
---
 kernel/futex/core.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c
index 69d9892..91f94b4 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/core.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/core.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ struct futex_pi_state {
  * the second.
  *
  * PI futexes are typically woken before they are removed from the hash list via
- * the rt_mutex code. See unqueue_me_pi().
+ * the rt_mutex code. See futex_unqueue_pi().
  */
 struct futex_q {
 	struct plist_node list;
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ enum {
 };
 
 static const struct futex_q futex_q_init = {
-	/* list gets initialized in queue_me()*/
+	/* list gets initialized in futex_queue()*/
 	.key		= FUTEX_KEY_INIT,
 	.bitset		= FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY,
 	.requeue_state	= ATOMIC_INIT(Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE),
@@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ static int attach_to_pi_state(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval,
 	/*
 	 * We get here with hb->lock held, and having found a
 	 * futex_top_waiter(). This means that futex_lock_pi() of said futex_q
-	 * has dropped the hb->lock in between queue_me() and unqueue_me_pi(),
+	 * has dropped the hb->lock in between futex_queue() and futex_unqueue_pi(),
 	 * which in turn means that futex_lock_pi() still has a reference on
 	 * our pi_state.
 	 *
@@ -2421,7 +2421,7 @@ static inline struct futex_hash_bucket *queue_lock(struct futex_q *q)
 	 * Increment the counter before taking the lock so that
 	 * a potential waker won't miss a to-be-slept task that is
 	 * waiting for the spinlock. This is safe as all queue_lock()
-	 * users end up calling queue_me(). Similarly, for housekeeping,
+	 * users end up calling futex_queue(). Similarly, for housekeeping,
 	 * decrement the counter at queue_unlock() when some error has
 	 * occurred and we don't end up adding the task to the list.
 	 */
@@ -2441,7 +2441,7 @@ queue_unlock(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
 	hb_waiters_dec(hb);
 }
 
-static inline void __queue_me(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+static inline void __futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
 {
 	int prio;
 
@@ -2461,36 +2461,36 @@ static inline void __queue_me(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
 }
 
 /**
- * queue_me() - Enqueue the futex_q on the futex_hash_bucket
+ * futex_queue() - Enqueue the futex_q on the futex_hash_bucket
  * @q:	The futex_q to enqueue
  * @hb:	The destination hash bucket
  *
  * The hb->lock must be held by the caller, and is released here. A call to
- * queue_me() is typically paired with exactly one call to unqueue_me().  The
- * exceptions involve the PI related operations, which may use unqueue_me_pi()
+ * futex_queue() is typically paired with exactly one call to futex_unqueue().  The
+ * exceptions involve the PI related operations, which may use futex_unqueue_pi()
  * or nothing if the unqueue is done as part of the wake process and the unqueue
  * state is implicit in the state of woken task (see futex_wait_requeue_pi() for
  * an example).
  */
-static inline void queue_me(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+static inline void futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
 	__releases(&hb->lock)
 {
-	__queue_me(q, hb);
+	__futex_queue(q, hb);
 	spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
 }
 
 /**
- * unqueue_me() - Remove the futex_q from its futex_hash_bucket
+ * futex_unqueue() - Remove the futex_q from its futex_hash_bucket
  * @q:	The futex_q to unqueue
  *
- * The q->lock_ptr must not be held by the caller. A call to unqueue_me() must
- * be paired with exactly one earlier call to queue_me().
+ * The q->lock_ptr must not be held by the caller. A call to futex_unqueue() must
+ * be paired with exactly one earlier call to futex_queue().
  *
  * Return:
  *  - 1 - if the futex_q was still queued (and we removed unqueued it);
  *  - 0 - if the futex_q was already removed by the waking thread
  */
-static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q)
+static int futex_unqueue(struct futex_q *q)
 {
 	spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -2537,7 +2537,7 @@ retry:
  * PI futexes can not be requeued and must remove themselves from the
  * hash bucket. The hash bucket lock (i.e. lock_ptr) is held.
  */
-static void unqueue_me_pi(struct futex_q *q)
+static void futex_unqueue_pi(struct futex_q *q)
 {
 	__unqueue_futex(q);
 
@@ -2787,7 +2787,7 @@ static int fixup_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
 }
 
 /**
- * futex_wait_queue_me() - queue_me() and wait for wakeup, timeout, or signal
+ * futex_wait_queue_me() - futex_queue() and wait for wakeup, timeout, or signal
  * @hb:		the futex hash bucket, must be locked by the caller
  * @q:		the futex_q to queue up on
  * @timeout:	the prepared hrtimer_sleeper, or null for no timeout
@@ -2798,11 +2798,11 @@ static void futex_wait_queue_me(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, struct futex_q *q,
 	/*
 	 * The task state is guaranteed to be set before another task can
 	 * wake it. set_current_state() is implemented using smp_store_mb() and
-	 * queue_me() calls spin_unlock() upon completion, both serializing
+	 * futex_queue() calls spin_unlock() upon completion, both serializing
 	 * access to the hash list and forcing another memory barrier.
 	 */
 	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-	queue_me(q, hb);
+	futex_queue(q, hb);
 
 	/* Arm the timer */
 	if (timeout)
@@ -2918,12 +2918,12 @@ retry:
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
-	/* queue_me and wait for wakeup, timeout, or a signal. */
+	/* futex_queue and wait for wakeup, timeout, or a signal. */
 	futex_wait_queue_me(hb, &q, to);
 
 	/* If we were woken (and unqueued), we succeeded, whatever. */
 	ret = 0;
-	if (!unqueue_me(&q))
+	if (!futex_unqueue(&q))
 		goto out;
 	ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 	if (to && !to->task)
@@ -3049,7 +3049,7 @@ retry_private:
 	/*
 	 * Only actually queue now that the atomic ops are done:
 	 */
-	__queue_me(&q, hb);
+	__futex_queue(&q, hb);
 
 	if (trylock) {
 		ret = rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
@@ -3121,7 +3121,7 @@ no_block:
 	if (res)
 		ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0;
 
-	unqueue_me_pi(&q);
+	futex_unqueue_pi(&q);
 	spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
 	goto out;
 
@@ -3479,7 +3479,7 @@ int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
 		if (res)
 			ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0;
 
-		unqueue_me_pi(&q);
+		futex_unqueue_pi(&q);
 		spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
 
 		if (ret == -EINTR) {

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-09 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-23 17:10 [PATCH v2 00/22] futex: splitup and waitv syscall André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] futex: Move to kernel/futex/ André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-09 14:23     ` André Almeida
2021-10-09 15:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] futex: Split out syscalls André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] futex: Rename {,__}{,un}queue_me() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] futex: Rename futex_wait_queue_me() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] futex: Rename: queue_{,un}lock() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] futex: Rename __unqueue_futex() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] futex: Rename hash_futex() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] futex: Rename: {get,cmpxchg}_futex_value_locked() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] futex: Split out PI futex André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] futex: Rename: hb_waiter_{inc,dec,pending}() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] futex: Rename: match_futex() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] futex: Rename mark_wake_futex() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] futex: Split out requeue André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 16:57     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-10-15 10:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] futex: Split out wait/wake André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] futex: Simplify double_lock_hb() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] futex: Implement sys_futex_waitv() André Almeida
2021-10-06 11:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]     ` <47b13460-27a4-474c-879b-ed1c668e5923@www.fastmail.com>
2021-10-07  9:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-07 13:27         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] futex,x86: Wire up sys_futex_waitv() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 18/22] futex,arm: " André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] selftests: futex: Add sys_futex_waitv() test André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] selftests: futex: Test sys_futex_waitv() timeout André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-11-09 11:18   ` [PATCH v2 20/22] " Vasily Gorbik
2021-11-09 12:52     ` André Almeida
2021-11-09 13:00       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-09 13:05       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] selftests: futex: Test sys_futex_waitv() wouldblock André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] futex2: Documentation: Document sys_futex_waitv() uAPI André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:06   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=163377403644.25758.6861294518686818049.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrealmeid@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).