From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<ming.lei@redhat.com>, <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
<hare@suse.de>, "John Garry" <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFT 0/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for shared tags
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:27:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1635852455-39935-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> (raw)
In [0], Kashyap reports high CPU usage for blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter()
and callees for shared tags.
Indeed blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() would be less optimum for moving to
shared tags, but it was not optimum previously.
So I would like this series tested, and also to know what is triggering
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() from userspace to cause such high CPU
loading.
As suggested by Ming, reading /proc/diskstats in a while true loop
can trigger blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(); I do so in a test with 2x
separate consoles, and here are the results:
v5.15
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() 6.2%
part_stat_read_all() 6.7
pre-v5.16 (Linus' master branch @ commit bfc484fe6abb)
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() 4.5%
part_stat_read_all() 6.2
pre-v5.16+this series
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() not shown in top users
part_stat_read_all() 7.5%
These results are from perf top, on a system with 7x
disks, with hisi_sas which has 16x HW queues.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/e4e92abbe9d52bcba6b8cc6c91c442cc@mail.gmail.com/
John Garry (3):
blk-mq: Drop busy_iter_fn blk_mq_hw_ctx argument
blk-mq: Delete busy_iter_fn
blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for shared tags
block/blk-mq-tag.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
block/blk-mq-tag.h | 2 +-
block/blk-mq.c | 17 ++++++-------
include/linux/blk-mq.h | 2 --
4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-02 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-02 11:27 John Garry [this message]
2021-11-02 11:27 ` [PATCH RFT 1/3] blk-mq: Drop busy_iter_fn blk_mq_hw_ctx argument John Garry
2021-11-09 3:02 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-28 10:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-11-02 11:27 ` [PATCH RFT 2/3] blk-mq: Delete busy_iter_fn John Garry
2021-11-09 3:05 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-28 10:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-11-02 11:27 ` [PATCH RFT 3/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for shared tags John Garry
2021-11-28 10:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-11-29 2:19 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-15 15:56 ` [PATCH RFT 0/3] " John Garry
2021-11-15 16:31 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-11-25 13:46 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-11-25 14:09 ` John Garry
2021-11-26 11:25 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-11-26 11:51 ` John Garry
2021-12-06 9:57 ` John Garry
2021-12-06 10:03 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-12-08 13:04 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1635852455-39935-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).