From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC9DC433F5 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236613AbhLSVAG (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:00:06 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:36660 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231646AbhLSVAE (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:00:04 -0500 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743B71F37B; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:00:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1639947603; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RTB8LgiFoLMd63+8gsmi/aw1sk99lR5a11u/xaqzZcY=; b=g2DH8M0R6UezmCHnLYcVGAcGlublRbjQd2euN3C4+/zCGkSzNZErVIZmNJYKo7wA973J3a obTVhDFLN6hQz0tg2Nf8o6RGSCRNtpjnC0VkKfk6gYNLv997IQfZWgTLImiL70GpxLbrtl YLQdAEkjYgdNBCVhWh08rm+/xNFVprs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1639947603; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RTB8LgiFoLMd63+8gsmi/aw1sk99lR5a11u/xaqzZcY=; b=2lsRd17vzTF94CWUCOGBkR/q2Irbn/g5LrOQ0aFul1CH81dh0fgLMz1/U3TkQIwm1CPvor NR8eBmXtgndRqODQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F29133A7; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id XmqML0+dv2GFMAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:59:59 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "NeilBrown" To: "Mark Hemment" Cc: "Trond Myklebust" , "Anna Schumaker" , "Chuck Lever" , "Andrew Morton" , "Mel Gorman" , "Christoph Hellwig" , "David Howells" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] MM: Add AS_CAN_DIO mapping flag In-reply-to: References: <163969801519.20885.3977673503103544412.stgit@noble.brown>, <163969850302.20885.17124747377211907111.stgit@noble.brown>, Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:59:56 +1100 Message-id: <163994759613.25899.17650220291128318661@noble.neil.brown.name> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Dec 2021, Mark Hemment wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 23:57, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > Currently various places test if direct IO is possible on a file by > > checking for the existence of the direct_IO address space operation. > > This is a poor choice, as the direct_IO operation may not be used - it is > > only used if the generic_file_*_iter functions are called for direct IO > > and some filesystems - particularly NFS - don't do this. > > > > Instead, introduce a new mapping flag: AS_CAN_DIO and change the various > > places to check this (avoiding a pointer dereference). > > unlock_new_inode() will set this flag if ->direct_IO is present, so > > filesystems do not need to be changed. > ... > > diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c > > index 6b80a51129d5..bae65ccecdb1 100644 > > --- a/fs/inode.c > > +++ b/fs/inode.c > > @@ -1008,6 +1008,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_annotate_inode_mutex_key); > > void unlock_new_inode(struct inode *inode) > > { > > lockdep_annotate_inode_mutex_key(inode); > > + if (inode->i_mapping->a_ops && > > + inode->i_mapping->a_ops->direct_IO) > > + set_bit(AS_CAN_DIO, &inode->i_mapping->flags); > > spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); > > WARN_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_NEW)); > > inode->i_state &= ~I_NEW & ~I_CREATING; > > Does d_instantiate_new() also need to set AS_CAN_DIO? Yes it does - thanks for catching that. I'll update my patch. Thanks, NeilBrown