From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946993Ab3BHT4S (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:56:18 -0500 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:35261 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946936Ab3BHT4R (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:56:17 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, artem.savkov@gmail.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9 Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:02:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1653071.l2kN4Hy2U6@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.8.0-rc6; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2130803.VQA31hf2jE@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq. > > I already did. Please check for-rafael branch Cool. This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then? > > Moreover, I'd very much prefer it if you fixed the problems introduced by > > b8eed8a "cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()" separately and *then* any > > other locking problems you're seeing in the code, although people are not > > reporting them. > > > > You seem to have a clear picture of how the code should work now, so that > > won't be a big trouble I guess. > > For me all problems are fixed in the current code. :) Sounds great. :-) Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.