From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio: support for GPIO forwarding
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:10:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16561596.EbsEtszXvm@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAVeFuJUdigJC+WcriOi+SEYDz0HCzU=KatDPfmzdA6ytBOd_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 06:32:46 PM Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:14:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Thursday, January 22, 2015 11:57:55 AM Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >> > If we decide to go ahead with the solution proposed by this patch for
> >> > practical reasons (which are good reasons indeed), I still have one
> >> > problem with its current form.
> >> >
> >> > As the discussion highlighted, this is an ACPI problem, so I'd very
> >> > much like it to be confined to the ACPI GPIO code, to be enabled only
> >> > when ACPI is, and to use function names that start with acpi_gpio.
> >>
> >> I can agree with that.
> >>
> >> > The current implementation leverages platform lookup, making said lookup
> >> > less efficient in the process and bringing confusion about its
> >> > purpose. Although the two processes are indeed similar, they are
> >> > separate things: one is a legitimate way to map GPIOs, the other is a
> >> > fixup for broken firmware.
> >> >
> >> > I suppose we all agree this is a hackish fix, so let's confine it as
> >> > much as we can.
> >>
> >> OK
> >>
> >> Heikki, any comments?
> >
> > I'm fine with that.
> >
> > That actually makes me think that we could then drop the lookup tables
> > completely and use device properties instead with the help of "generic
> > property" (attached):
> >
> > We would just need to agree on the format how to describe a gpio
> > property, document it and of course convert the current users as
> > usual. The format could be something like this as an example (I'm
> > writing this out of my head so don't shoot me if you can see it would
> > not work. Just an example):
> >
> > static const u32 example_gpio[] = { <gpio>, <flags>,爙;
> >
> > static struct dev_gen_prop example_prop[] =
> > {
> > .type = DEV_PROP_U32,
> > .name = "gpio,<con_id>",
> > .nval = 2,
> > .num = &example_gpio,
> > },
> > { },
> > };
> >
> > static struct platform_device example_pdev = {
> > ...
> > .dev = {
> > .gen_prop = &example_prop,
> > },
> > }
> >
> >
> > In gpiolib.c we would then, instead of going through the lookups,
> > simply ask for that property:
> >
> > ...
> > sprintf(propname, "gpio,%s", con_id);
> > device_property_read_u32_array(dev, propname, &val, 2);
> > ...
> > desc = gpio_to_desc(val[0]);
> > flags = val[1];
> > ...
> >
> >
> > So this is just and idea. I think it would be relatively easy to
> > implement. What do you guys think?
>
> At first sight, that looks like a very good idea and a great use of
> the device properties API. Are you willing to explore it further?
I guess Heikki is waiting for my feedback on his core patch that I'm
going to provide later today.
And yes, this is an interesting idea.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-10 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-18 8:23 [RFC PATCH] gpio: support for GPIO forwarding Heikki Krogerus
2015-01-08 8:25 ` Heikki Krogerus
2015-01-15 9:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-01-14 12:58 ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-14 16:32 ` Darren Hart
2015-01-15 9:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-01-15 9:40 ` Heikki Krogerus
2015-01-14 16:32 ` Darren Hart
2015-01-19 5:59 ` Alexandre Courbot
2015-01-19 11:53 ` Heikki Krogerus
2015-01-20 12:16 ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-20 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-01-22 2:57 ` Alexandre Courbot
2015-01-22 16:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-01-23 11:21 ` Heikki Krogerus
2015-01-23 15:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-01-26 13:06 ` Heikki Krogerus
2015-02-10 9:32 ` Alexandre Courbot
2015-02-10 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2015-02-12 12:46 ` Heikki Krogerus
2015-02-24 20:34 ` David Cohen
2015-02-25 1:34 ` Alexandre Courbot
2015-02-25 18:25 ` David Cohen
2015-03-07 22:13 ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-22 8:17 ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-22 16:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-01-30 14:48 ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-30 16:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-04 9:51 ` Linus Walleij
2015-02-04 14:11 ` Heikki Krogerus
2015-02-10 9:44 ` Alexandre Courbot
2015-02-12 12:38 ` Heikki Krogerus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16561596.EbsEtszXvm@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).