From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>,
Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@hotmail.com>,
Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn>,
cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device()
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 17:17:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1691b160-5558-d4c3-afed-5773e115c5aa@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASzd=bL1H34w-E_UD9x6w2=ObyS+EPDZ_jrvfV+ncw-yA@mail.gmail.com>
> Applied to linux-kbuild.
A questionable development version was integrated for this SmPL script.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci?id=da9cfb87a44da61f2403c4312916befcb6b6d7e8
https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn/
Now I am curious on how such a source code analysis approach will be
improved further.
Which changes will get the desired acceptance?
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1053979/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1553321671-27749-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn/
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-March/005679.html
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-23 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-15 7:55 [PATCH v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device() Wen Yang
2019-02-15 9:10 ` Markus Elfring
2019-02-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v5] Coccinelle: " Markus Elfring
2019-02-15 13:02 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-15 13:15 ` [v5] " Markus Elfring
2019-02-15 13:15 ` Markus Elfring
2019-02-15 13:24 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-15 13:54 ` Markus Elfring
2019-03-17 3:54 ` [PATCH v5] coccinelle: " Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-17 9:05 ` [v5] " Markus Elfring
2019-03-23 16:17 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-03-26 6:54 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-26 7:19 ` Julia Lawall
2019-03-26 9:14 ` Markus Elfring
2019-03-26 9:04 ` Markus Elfring
2019-03-26 9:52 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-26 9:58 ` Julia Lawall
[not found] <201902161529041506841@zte.com.cn>
2019-02-16 8:09 ` [v5] Coccinelle: " Julia Lawall
2019-02-16 8:29 ` Markus Elfring
2019-02-16 8:32 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-16 8:44 ` Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1691b160-5558-d4c3-afed-5773e115c5aa@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=wang.yi59@zte.com.cn \
--cc=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=yellowriver2010@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).