linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	robdclark@gmail.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	tfiga@chromium.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, architt@codeaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, jcrouse@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:51:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1694664.FhRBrgajmF@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180708173413.1965-3-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>

On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:11 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> 
> The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
> the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
> separately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> [vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
>  - Change since v11
>    * Replaced pm_runtime_disable() with pm_runtime_force_suspend()
>      to avoid warning about " Unpreparing enabled clock".
>      Full warning text mentioned in cover patch.
> 
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index a01d0dde21dd..09265e206e2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,20 @@ static struct arm_smmu_option_prop arm_smmu_options[] = {
>  	{ 0, NULL},
>  };
>  
> +static inline int arm_smmu_rpm_get(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))

Why do you need the pm_runtime_enabled() checks here and below?

pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put() should work just fine if
runtime PM is not enabled.

> +		return pm_runtime_get_sync(smmu->dev);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arm_smmu_rpm_put(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		pm_runtime_put(smmu->dev);
> +}
> +
>  static struct arm_smmu_domain *to_smmu_domain(struct iommu_domain *dom)
>  {
>  	return container_of(dom, struct arm_smmu_domain, domain);
> @@ -913,11 +927,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  	struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
> -	int irq;
> +	int ret, irq;
>  
>  	if (!smmu || domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY)
>  		return;
>  
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Disable the context bank and free the page tables before freeing
>  	 * it.
> @@ -932,6 +950,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  
>  	free_io_pgtable_ops(smmu_domain->pgtbl_ops);
>  	__arm_smmu_free_bitmap(smmu->context_map, cfg->cbndx);
> +
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
>  }
>  
>  static struct iommu_domain *arm_smmu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
> @@ -1213,10 +1233,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
> +
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	/* Ensure that the domain is finalised */
>  	ret = arm_smmu_init_domain_context(domain, smmu);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Sanity check the domain. We don't support domains across
> @@ -1226,33 +1251,50 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>  		dev_err(dev,
>  			"cannot attach to SMMU %s whilst already attached to domain on SMMU %s\n",
>  			dev_name(smmu_domain->smmu->dev), dev_name(smmu->dev));
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */
> -	return arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
> +	ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
> +
> +rpm_put:
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int arm_smmu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>  			phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, int prot)
>  {
>  	struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!ops)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	return ops->map(ops, iova, paddr, size, prot);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	ret = ops->map(ops, iova, paddr, size, prot);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static size_t arm_smmu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>  			     size_t size)
>  {
>  	struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
> +	size_t ret;
>  
>  	if (!ops)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	return ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	ret = ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> @@ -1407,7 +1449,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>  	while (i--)
>  		cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
>  
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto out_cfg_free;
> +
>  	ret = arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(dev);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_cfg_free;
>  
> @@ -1427,7 +1475,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>  	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
>  	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> -
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
>  		return;
> @@ -1435,8 +1483,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>  	cfg  = fwspec->iommu_priv;
>  	smmu = cfg->smmu;
>  
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return;
> +
>  	iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
>  	arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec);
> +
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>  	iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
>  	kfree(fwspec->iommu_priv);
>  	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
> @@ -2124,6 +2179,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		smmu->irqs[i] = irq;
>  	}
>  
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, smmu);
> +
>  	err = devm_clk_bulk_get(smmu->dev, smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
> @@ -2132,6 +2189,19 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * We want to avoid touching dev->power.lock in fastpaths unless
> +	 * it's really going to do something useful - pm_runtime_enabled()
> +	 * can serve as an ideal proxy for that decision. So, conditionally
> +	 * enable pm_runtime.
> +	 */
> +	if (dev->pm_domain)
> +		pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +
> +	err = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		return err;
> +
>  	err = arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(smmu);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
> @@ -2173,10 +2243,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return err;
>  	}
>  
> -	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, smmu);
>  	arm_smmu_device_reset(smmu);
>  	arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(smmu);
>  
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * For ACPI and generic DT bindings, an SMMU will be probed before
>  	 * any device which might need it, so we want the bus ops in place
> @@ -2212,8 +2283,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!bitmap_empty(smmu->context_map, ARM_SMMU_MAX_CBS))
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "removing device with active domains!\n");
>  
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>  	/* Turn the thing off */
>  	writel(sCR0_CLIENTPD, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		pm_runtime_force_suspend(smmu->dev);
>  
>  	clk_bulk_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>  
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-11  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-08 17:34 [PATCH v12 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Vivek Gautam
2018-07-08 17:34 ` [PATCH v12 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops Vivek Gautam
2018-07-11  9:50   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-11 10:55     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-11 11:11       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-11 12:51         ` Tomasz Figa
2018-07-11 13:40           ` Marek Szyprowski
2018-07-11 20:36             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-23  5:59               ` Marek Szyprowski
2018-07-23 11:05                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-12 10:57           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-16  8:51             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-16 10:11               ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-16 10:23                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-08 17:34 ` [PATCH v12 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device Vivek Gautam
2018-07-11  9:51   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-07-11 10:05     ` Tomasz Figa
2018-07-11 10:59       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-11 11:30         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-08 17:34 ` [PATCH v12 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu Vivek Gautam
2018-07-11  9:53   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-11 10:36     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-12 12:41       ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-16  8:55         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-16 11:46           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-17  7:46             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-17  8:30               ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-18  9:30     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-18 12:43       ` Robin Murphy
2018-07-18 13:31         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-08 17:34 ` [PATCH v12 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1694664.FhRBrgajmF@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).