linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	"herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com" <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"serge@hallyn.com" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"pvorel@suse.cz" <pvorel@suse.cz>,
	"tiwai@suse.de" <tiwai@suse.de>,
	"keyrings@vger.kernel.org" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] KEYS: Introduce a builtin root of trust key flag
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 17:34:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16DDA7F1-95BA-4279-BE4E-9F713A905B36@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8965652274b49ba7c6f67cad6d42965cf984b42.camel@linux.ibm.com>



> On Apr 8, 2022, at 10:55 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 15:27 +0000, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>> 
>>> On Apr 8, 2022, at 8:40 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 2022-04-05 at 21:53 -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The first type of key to use this is X.509.  When a X.509 certificate
>>>> is self signed, has the kernCertSign Key Usage set and contains the
>>>> CA bit set this new flag is set.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/key.h b/include/linux/key.h
>>>> index 7febc4881363..97f6a1f86a27 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/key.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/key.h
>>>> @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ struct key {
>>>> #define KEY_FLAG_ROOT_CAN_INVAL	7	/* set if key can be invalidated by root without permission */
>>>> #define KEY_FLAG_KEEP		8	/* set if key should not be removed */
>>>> #define KEY_FLAG_UID_KEYRING	9	/* set if key is a user or user session keyring */
>>>> +#define KEY_FLAG_BUILTIN_ROT	10	/* set if key is a builtin Root of Trust key */
>>>> 
>>>> 	/* the key type and key description string
>>>> 	 * - the desc is used to match a key against search criteria
>>>> @@ -290,6 +291,7 @@ extern struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type,
>>>> #define KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION	0x0008	/* Override the check on restricted keyrings */
>>>> #define KEY_ALLOC_UID_KEYRING		0x0010	/* allocating a user or user session keyring */
>>>> #define KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP		0x0020	/* Set the KEEP flag on the key/keyring */
>>>> +#define KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN_ROT		0x0040  /* Add builtin root of trust key */
>>> 
>>> Since the concept of root of trust is not generic, but limited to
>>> specific keyrings, the root CA certificate signing keys on the
>>> "machine" keyring need to be identified.  Similar to the
>>> KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN/KEY_FLAG_BUILTIN, new flags
>>> KEY_ALLOC_MACHINE/KEY_FLAG_MACHINE should be defined instead.
>> 
>> I’m open to renaming these, however this name change seems confusing to me.  
>> This flag gets set when the X.509 certificate contains the three CA requirements 
>> identified above.  The remaining keys in the machine keyring can be used for 
>> anything else.
> 
> Renaming the flag to KEY_ALLOC_MACHINE/KEY_FLAG_MACHINE differentiates
> between the "builtin" keys from the "machine" keys.  The trust models
> are very different.

Isn’t the trust model the same for machine and secondary keys?  Both are supplied by 
the end-user. That is why I’m confused by naming something _MACHINE when it applies 
to more than one keyring.

>> Plus this flag can be set for keys loaded into the secondary trusted 
>> keyring (6th patch in the series).  When an intermediate CA gets loaded into the 
>> secondary, the flag is set as well.
> 
> Please include a full explanation with the motivation in the patch
> description as to why support for intermediary CAs is required for the
> "end-user" use case.

Ok, I can add it.  I thought this was an expectation, based on the help section of
IMA_KEYRINGS_PERMIT_SIGNED_BY_BUILTIN_OR_SECONDARY:

" Intermediate keys between those the kernel has compiled in and the 
 IMA keys to be added may be added to the system secondary keyring,
 provided they are validly signed by a key already resident in the
 built-in or secondary trusted keyrings."


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-08 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-06  1:53 [PATCH 0/7] Add CA enforcement keyring restrictions Eric Snowberg
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] KEYS: Create static version of public_key_verify_signature Eric Snowberg
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] KEYS: X.509: Parse Basic Constraints for CA Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 14:39   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-08 15:31     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] KEYS: X.509: Parse Key Usage Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 14:39   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] KEYS: Introduce a builtin root of trust key flag Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 14:40   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-08 15:27     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 16:55       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-08 17:34         ` Eric Snowberg [this message]
2022-04-08 18:49           ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-08 21:59             ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-11 15:30               ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-14 16:36                 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-14 18:09                   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-14 21:59                     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-15 16:14                       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] KEYS: Introduce sig restriction that validates root of trust Eric Snowberg
2022-04-06 19:55   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] KEYS: X.509: Flag Intermediate CA certs as built in Eric Snowberg
2022-04-07  1:04   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] integrity: Use root of trust signature restriction Eric Snowberg
2022-04-06 20:45 ` [PATCH 0/7] Add CA enforcement keyring restrictions Mimi Zohar
2022-04-06 22:53   ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 14:41     ` Mimi Zohar
2022-11-04 13:20 ` Coiby Xu
2022-11-04 21:06   ` Eric Snowberg
2022-11-09  1:24   ` Elaine Palmer
2022-11-09 14:25     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-11-09 14:58       ` Elaine Palmer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16DDA7F1-95BA-4279-BE4E-9F713A905B36@oracle.com \
    --to=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).