Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Always attempt to allocate at least one page during bulk allocation

[Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>]

On 26/05/2022 11.12, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Peter Pavlisko reported the following problem on kernel bugzilla 216007.
> 
> 	When I try to extract an uncompressed tar archive (2.6 milion
> 	files, 760.3 GiB in size) on newly created (empty) XFS file system,
> 	after first low tens of gigabytes extracted the process hangs in
> 	iowait indefinitely. One CPU core is 100% occupied with iowait,
> 	the other CPU core is idle (on 2-core Intel Celeron G1610T).
> 
> It was bisected to c9fa563072e1 ("xfs: use alloc_pages_bulk_array() for
> buffers") but XFS is only the messenger. The problem is that nothing
> is waking kswapd to reclaim some pages at a time the PCP lists cannot
> be refilled until some reclaim happens. The bulk allocator checks that
> there are some pages in the array and the original intent was that a bulk
> allocator did not necessarily need all the requested pages and it was
> best to return as quickly as possible. This was fine for the first user
> of the API but both NFS and XFS require the requested number of pages
> be available before making progress. Both could be adjusted to call the
> page allocator directly if a bulk allocation fails but it puts a burden on
> users of the API. Adjust the semantics to attempt at least one allocation
> via __alloc_pages() before returning so kswapd is woken if necessary.
> 
> It was reported via bugzilla that the patch addressed the problem and
> that the tar extraction completed successfully. This may also address
> bug 215975 but has yet to be confirmed.
> 
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216007
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215975
> Fixes: 387ba26fb1cb ("mm/page_alloc: add a bulk page allocator")
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.13+
> ---
>   mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


Change looks good, and I checked page_pool will be fine with this change :-)

Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>


> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 0e42038382c1..5ced6cb260ed 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5324,8 +5324,8 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
>   		page = __rmqueue_pcplist(zone, 0, ac.migratetype, alloc_flags,
>   								pcp, pcp_list);
>   		if (unlikely(!page)) {
> -			/* Try and get at least one page */
> -			if (!nr_populated)
> +			/* Try and allocate at least one page */
> +			if (!nr_account)
>   				goto failed_irq;
>   			break;
>   		}
>