From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B1E72C1AE; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708344418; cv=none; b=YwYYNR4VZ/Fxh4IaR9NvKtpa3dSDQ5WZlODTuvpt0roSGBmUpd/UJGSAJiFqFhhE6vPWMpM2BhneHQidqLBFUX3TCpuwWWlwF3Z73rZqDHKbxt9eHTh4Ts8rxd8WtKReYj7lSa6vtlGeLg/c8puQgDNWqeOBvJ2oteRYj61K8oY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708344418; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pDZK7NPfB1MTel/LL2NIFxKTCuRuSZodULRbT2pMx4E=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kX7+HYgARSR+Fi6EciDdN+5/Y+9z7vMAanhxza+BrmycndiKKfC3kGKqXLsbiaq/1Y0UeZV/Fs08O8ecbBsAxssOVDweSGZskjCy0TJKot7KFi3CuIf1b9HmC2YLjH7ZwMjkZtivKD70ed96rYUrKT8emKMZJCIU2Tu7e5Cgwt0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=CF94/7WZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CF94/7WZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708344417; x=1739880417; h=from:to:in-reply-to:references:subject:message-id:date: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pDZK7NPfB1MTel/LL2NIFxKTCuRuSZodULRbT2pMx4E=; b=CF94/7WZQ1adw61QsZdmsExf326Tfiv/8Ln41Wg4BpU23dmUN9orw24u cc5Gf/Ud6vAAsvP2Fpw8Pvy1+C0ssRIDeMqPVlI1F3ZK5FecpNYA3BkAJ KWuvTwLc7dIXSozbRE0H/XAaPUriKb8KM2d09G3blSVX5ZMMF1ilcwXAs wLdDAe78j/VRGEM6bmt8htko4sckGbrFw+hvD2qVdhu38BskKZDdQ7XV0 i41kFp20Du73V6Q55onLRjKiBZVHx56XTgo5PWV+n2/b/BroeDI9z+nDB 7/PsxKiJQ2sWFLDz7Z6TvJKsn5trDCTtyhATEqnTS6vId7Be4QYphUMdF Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10988"; a="13127979" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,170,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="13127979" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Feb 2024 04:06:55 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,170,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="4474117" Received: from ijarvine-desk1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.246.48.18]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Feb 2024 04:06:52 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, jwoithe@just42.net, hdegoede@redhat.com, W_Armin@gmx.de, Szilard Fabian In-Reply-To: <20240215203012.228758-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> References: <20240129163502.161409-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240129175714.164326-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240207023031.56805-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240215203012.228758-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop: Add battery charge control support Message-Id: <170834440647.4050.13047961348645894978.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:06:46 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.12.3 On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:31:43 +0000, Szilard Fabian wrote: > This patch adds battery charge control support on Fujitsu notebooks > via the S006 method of the FUJ02E3 ACPI device. With this method it's > possible to set charge_control_end_threshold between 50 and 100%. > > Tested on Lifebook E5411 and Lifebook U728. Sadly I can't test this > patch on a dual battery one, but I didn't find any clue about > independent battery charge control on dual battery Fujitsu notebooks > either. And by that I mean checking the DSDT table of various Lifebook > notebooks and reverse engineering FUJ02E3.dll. > > [...] Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local review-ilpo branch. Note it will show up in the public platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo branch only once I've pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. The list of commits applied: [1/1] platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop: Add battery charge control support commit: 9b716ef48c90446b8d6d86726c6c3f0141e53091 -- i.