From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F6EC17447 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B686021D7F for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lca.pw header.i=@lca.pw header.b="WoSwtQid" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727089AbfKLAyn (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:54:43 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f66.google.com ([209.85.219.66]:40876 "EHLO mail-qv1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726910AbfKLAyn (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:54:43 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f66.google.com with SMTP id i3so5511835qvv.7 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:54:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wDIf+AsFEXv3NCdOQayJNG94WJKxDDU6WBSBA7KBd1Y=; b=WoSwtQidVmlZ8XkxO+Zq/D0sdD/dXfHOSL1CPyaLogJejmZ52HNTiqN4BYzRE0gZM2 922kuxJpcSKYDY1hFa5mHk8K3Ay7tox4S0c/J/F2QFkkSaf8gKtWWBQCQLqlfayQNdXk MZtBauhqbNAXeI7O8rmHDCWj6F6YtymPJVzKDWdHV+qpDRUyxw5njcozWtoHfNIYoLzo Zv9ISX3jjbbRzWaR+/XagZkbjR7RChgMQG4DYUCJ4CbzD/vSilVk2JAHp2xTAYOrVlUx jbSdbmfYUjBP7oq0S+TglOC6H9Cc2JAnlKq5U0/CeZeuSUvqmnmHDeGdaIwiu1s2fFli 328w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wDIf+AsFEXv3NCdOQayJNG94WJKxDDU6WBSBA7KBd1Y=; b=FEOWLQO3By7gaaWh89B45KQ2JbFfChq0lfOaZBtz09xz+oNaYsC3BZuCiwstUnl30v P1NBDjnViSPaMwUIBrVwACYcVyPyS1KUsHbiBYkOf6bN20V5qHyNOlEZRBkni9uiY7Gc 2a8Q+DUgj+HVVxmvdVT4dASxVFeqNKcC5ymAlCtRZ+Wi8TloMQMeleXrAgdhG/19q4Tb 1VE4ytCfaQ1Qg+SWxgb0sIbBO11ZHcgO8MUfhSlpeZJgCgkiqvmIfoYxCCno+pL/MXov ptjgvZzTnH+RLyeLUpmL+hqlznY28r3gL80CJVZ8P5ruIICqTgl/PPS+zBWMb5htSrIe OUGA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUCn6Wv+adgVAuHV5TLqdZvXNY2cJ8NbbI7TzETXCeXzo3QwjhH oqCbfb9oz1S44tCF6qSZHkHfjg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw0hxG4YxMvZ8p+kGWJOZquKlxFpN40XW/i3KDi/bDwap1SrSIcd5cG0onCa0pm9ENXXu3pRg== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:95c8:: with SMTP id t8mr25861272qvt.227.1573520082377; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.153] (pool-71-184-117-43.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [71.184.117.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a18sm8900449qkc.2.2019.11.11.16.54.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:54:41 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Avoid spurious lock dependencies From: Qian Cai In-Reply-To: <20191029124453.GM4114@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:54:40 -0500 Cc: Andrew Morton , bigeasy@linutronix.de, Thomas Gleixner , thgarnie@google.com, tytso@mit.edu, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <17A8506A-D7E1-4EF8-82F0-3AC897B85A5F@lca.pw> References: <20191001091837.GK4536@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20191029124453.GM4114@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> To: Peter Zijlstra X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Oct 29, 2019, at 8:44 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:10:34AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote: >> >> It looks like this patch has been forgotten forever. Do you need to >> repost, so Ingo might have a better chance to pick it up? > > I've queued it now, sorry! Hmm, this is still not even in the linux-next after another 2 weeks. Not sure what to do except carrying the patch on my own.