From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264054AbTDWOjB (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:39:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264056AbTDWOjA (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:39:00 -0400 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:42458 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264054AbTDWOi7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:38:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:51:00 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.5.68-mm2 Message-ID: <18400000.1051109459@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <20030423012046.0535e4fd.akpm@digeo.com> References: <20030423012046.0535e4fd.akpm@digeo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > . I got tired of the objrmap code going BUG under stress, so it is now in > disgrace in the experimental/ directory. Any chance of some more info on that? BUG at what point in the code, and with what test to reproduce? M.