From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:08:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1855683.1QnG4Fe4Hq@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161010202322.labiotb5dsf4oyfi@treble>
On Monday, October 10, 2016 3:23:22 PM CEST Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> Thanks for reporting it. It looks like 'mtune=atom' sometimes makes a
> slight change to one of the stack frame setup instructions. Instead of:
>
> move rsp, rbp
>
> It sometimes does:
>
> lea (%rsp),%rbp
>
> They're two different instructions, but they have the same result. It's
> an easy fix for objtool. I'll post a patch soon.
>
>
Ah, good to hear. I've replaced my patch with yours in my randconfig
tests now and will let you know if there are any other warnings on
atom. I've done a few thousand x86 randconfig builds now and done private
patches for all warnings I got (I previously had fixes only for the arm
warnings). I found objtool warnings for a few files in some configurations
that do not involve -mtune=atom, maybe you can also look at what
is going on there as I have no idea for how to address them:
drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.o: warning: objtool: fnic_log_q_error() falls through to next function fnic_handle_link_event()
drivers/scsi/snic/snic_res.o: warning: objtool: .text: unexpected end of section
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_comp.o: warning: objtool: rxe_completer()+0x2f3: sibling call from callable instruction with changed frame pointer
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.o: warning: objtool: rxe_responder()+0x10f: sibling call from callable instruction with changed frame pointer
kernel/locking/rwsem.o: warning: objtool: down_write_killable()+0x16: call without frame pointer save/setup
I can provide additional information for reproducing them if it's
not immediately obvious what the problems are.
Thanks,
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-11 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-10 12:56 [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-10 20:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11 8:08 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-10-11 12:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11 13:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-11 15:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11 15:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11 20:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-12 13:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-13 12:46 ` Another gcc corruption bug (was Re: [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings) Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-13 17:57 ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-10-13 20:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01 9:34 ` [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 9:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 14:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01 15:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 16:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01 22:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 22:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02 1:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 6:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-02 12:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 13:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-02 14:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 14:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-02 22:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02 23:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-03 8:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-03 11:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 14:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01 15:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02 18:25 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 22:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02 22:57 ` [PATCH] objtool: fix another gcc jump table detection issue Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 23:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-11 1:53 ` [PATCH] objtool: support '-mtune=atom' stack frame setup instruction Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1855683.1QnG4Fe4Hq@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).