On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:45:12 +0200, Thomas Gleixner said:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, nick wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> > index f42129d..e1830af 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> > @@ -3797,7 +3797,7 @@ static irqreturn_t e1000_intr(int irq, void *data)
> >  		hw->get_link_status = 1;
> >  		/* guard against interrupt when we're going down */
> >  		if (!test_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->flags))
> > -			schedule_delayed_work(&adapter->watchdog_task, 1);
> > +			mod_work(&adapter->watchdog_task, jiffies + 1);
>
> And that's not even funny anymore. Are you using a random generator to create
> these patches?

At some point, we need to decide if the occasional accidentally-correct
trivial patch from Nick is worth all the wasted maintainer time.