From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 22:29:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1896930.yhFM10tt3d@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51126078.2050504@suse.cz>
On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 02:54:00 PM Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 12:04 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 31, 2013 02:10:34 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:12:58PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> Yes, there are two bugs in e1000e, it appears. Konstantin's
> >>> patch [2/5] fixes one of them, but the other one has to be fixed
> >>> differently.
> >>>
> >>> Boris, would you be able to test a couple of e1000e patches for me?
> >>
> >> Sure, send them on. You can add 2/5 in the mix too.
> >
> > There you go.
> >
> > The [2/5] is at: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2001211/
> >
> > The other two are attached. I suppose the ordering doesn't matter.
>
> Just a side question, are these going to be merged some time soon? I
> don't even see them in -next and I would like to backport them to
> opensuse as they affect also 3.7...
Not these particular patches, but there's a series on linux-pci from
Konstantin Khlebnikov that is functionally equivalent. I'm not sure who's
going to take that, though. I've acked it.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-06 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 20:28 Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0 Borislav Petkov
2013-01-29 21:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-30 3:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 17:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-30 17:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 19:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 20:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 20:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-30 22:17 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-30 23:12 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 23:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-31 0:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31 7:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 8:14 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-31 13:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31 13:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-02 23:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 14:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-03 20:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 20:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-03 21:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-03 21:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-14 14:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-14 17:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-14 19:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-15 8:54 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-02-15 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-04 21:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 0:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-03-05 9:42 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-05 9:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 10:01 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-05 10:02 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 10:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 10:29 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 11:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 11:33 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 11:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-06 0:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-06 0:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-08 16:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 10:01 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 10:04 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-01 12:51 ` e1000e broken after resume on x230 [was: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.] Jiri Slaby
2013-02-06 13:54 ` Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0 Jiri Slaby
2013-02-06 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-01-31 8:28 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-31 13:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 13:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-01 12:55 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-04 7:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-04 9:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-04 9:38 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-04 9:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 13:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 21:29 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1896930.yhFM10tt3d@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).