linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
	Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>,
	Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Ihab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com>,
	Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: re: iwlwifi: refactor the SAR tables from mvm to acpi
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 00:02:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18ea9fa8-93fe-f371-68ee-3d12eac252c8@canonical.com> (raw)

Hi,

Static analysis with Coverity has detected a potential issue with the
following commit:

commit 39c1a9728f938c7255ce507c8d56b73e8a4ebddf
Author: Ihab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Nov 15 09:28:11 2019 +0200

    iwlwifi: refactor the SAR tables from mvm to acpi


in function iwl_sar_get_ewrd_table() we have an array index pos being
initialized to 3 and then incremented each time a loop iterates:

        for (i = 0; i < n_profiles; i++) {
                /* the tables start at element 3 */
                int pos = 3;

                /* The EWRD profiles officially go from 2 to 4, but we
                 * save them in sar_profiles[1-3] (because we don't
                 * have profile 0).  So in the array we start from 1.
                 */
                ret = iwl_sar_set_profile(&wifi_pkg->package.elements[pos],
                                          &fwrt->sar_profiles[i + 1],
                                          enabled);
                if (ret < 0)
                        break;

                /* go to the next table */
                pos += ACPI_SAR_TABLE_SIZE;
        }

So, each iteration is always accessing package.elements[3]. I'm not sure
if that is intentional. If it is, then the increment of pos is not
required.  Either way, it's not clear what the original intention is.

Colin

             reply	other threads:[~2019-12-20  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-20  0:02 Colin Ian King [this message]
2019-12-20  5:40 ` iwlwifi: refactor the SAR tables from mvm to acpi Luciano Coelho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18ea9fa8-93fe-f371-68ee-3d12eac252c8@canonical.com \
    --to=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=ihab.zhaika@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
    --cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).