From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
oerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>,
zhiteng.huang@intel.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] perf & kvm: Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2030 09:04:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1902445479.2078.458.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC588CF.5010507@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 12:20 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/14/2030 12:05 PM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > Here is the new patch of V3 against tip/master of April 13th
> > if anyone wants to try it.
> >
> >
>
> Thanks for persisting despite the flames.
>
> Can you please separate arch/x86/kvm part of the patch? That will make
> for easier reviewing, and will need to go through separate trees.
I should do so definitely, and will do so in next version which also fixes
some issues pointed by Ingo.
>
> Sheng, did you make any progress with the NMI injection issue?
>
> > +
> > diff -Nraup linux-2.6_tip0413/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c linux-2.6_tip0413_perfkvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > --- linux-2.6_tip0413/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c 2010-04-14 11:11:04.341042024 +0800
> > +++ linux-2.6_tip0413_perfkvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c 2010-04-14 11:32:45.841278890 +0800
> > @@ -3765,6 +3765,35 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_vcpu *, current_vcpu);
> > +
> > +static int kvm_is_in_guest(void)
> > +{
> > + return percpu_read(current_vcpu) != NULL;
> >
>
> An even more accurate way to determine this is to check whether the
> interrupt frame points back at the 'int $2' instruction. However we
> plan to switch to a self-IPI method to inject the NMI, and I'm not sure
> wether APIC NMIs are accepted on an instruction boundary or whether
> there's some latency involved.
Yes. But the frame pointer checking seems a little complicated.
>
> > +static unsigned long kvm_get_guest_ip(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long ip = 0;
> > + if (percpu_read(current_vcpu))
> > + ip = kvm_rip_read(percpu_read(current_vcpu));
> > + return ip;
> > +}
> >
>
> This may be racy. kvm_rip_read() accesses a cache in memory; if we're
> in the process of updating the cache, then we may read a stale value.
> See below.
Right. The racy window seems too big.
>
> >
> > trace_kvm_entry(vcpu->vcpu_id);
> > +
> > + percpu_write(current_vcpu, vcpu);
> > kvm_x86_ops->run(vcpu);
> > + percpu_write(current_vcpu, NULL);
> >
>
> If you move this around the 'int $2' instructions you will close the
> race, as a stray NMI won't catch us updating the rip cache. But that
> depends on whether self-IPI is accepted on the next instruction or not.
Right. The kernel part has dependency on the self-IPI implementation.
I will move above percpu_write(current_vcpu, vcpu) (or a new wrapper function)
just around 'int $2'.
Sheng would find a solution on the self-IPI delivery. Let's separate my patch
and self-IPI as 2 issues as we don't know when the self-IPI delivery would be
resolved.
Thanks,
Yanmin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-15 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2030-04-14 9:05 [PATCH V3] perf & kvm: Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side Zhang, Yanmin
2010-04-14 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-14 9:43 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-14 9:57 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-14 10:14 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-14 10:19 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-14 10:27 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-14 10:33 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-14 10:36 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-14 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-14 11:17 ` Avi Kivity
2030-04-15 1:04 ` Zhang, Yanmin [this message]
2010-04-15 8:05 ` Avi Kivity
2030-04-15 8:57 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-04-15 9:04 ` oerg Roedel
2010-04-15 9:09 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-15 9:44 ` oerg Roedel
2010-04-15 9:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-15 10:40 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-15 10:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-15 14:08 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-17 18:12 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 8:25 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-20 3:32 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-20 9:38 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 19:03 ` [PATCH] Psychovisually-optimized HZ setting (2.6.33.3) Uwaysi Bin Kareem
2010-04-27 19:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-04-27 21:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1902445479.2078.458.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com \
--to=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
--cc=zhiteng.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).